XLPP.L vs. SGLS.L
XLPP.L (Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF) and SGLS.L (Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC) are both exchange-traded funds - XLPP.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while SGLS.L is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Gold (GBP Hedged). Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLPP.L returned 7.90%/yr vs 17.34%/yr for SGLS.L. At a correlation of -0.11, they often move in opposite directions. XLPP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.34%/yr for SGLS.L.
Performance
XLPP.L vs. SGLS.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLPP.L achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly higher than SGLS.L's 3.01% return.
XLPP.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 6.46%
- 6M
- 6.19%
- 1Y
- 3.14%
- 3Y*
- 5.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
SGLS.L
- 1D
- 0.62%
- 1M
- -2.49%
- YTD
- 3.01%
- 6M
- 5.20%
- 1Y
- 30.77%
- 3Y*
- 29.59%
- 5Y*
- 17.34%
- 10Y*
- —
XLPP.L vs. SGLS.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLPP.L Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF | 6.46% | -2.88% | 15.99% | -5.68% | 11.45% | 19.81% | 3.05% |
SGLS.L Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC | 3.01% | 64.22% | 24.42% | 11.48% | -1.42% | -4.63% | -3.17% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLPP.L and SGLS.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.12 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 29, 2020 | -0.11 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLPP.L vs. SGLS.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLPP.L
SGLS.L
XLPP.L vs. SGLS.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) and Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLPP.L | SGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.02 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.24 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.24 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | 1.71 | -1.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.81 | 4.48 | -3.68 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLPP.L | SGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 1.24 | -1.02 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | 1.07 | -0.48 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.90 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
XLPP.L vs. SGLS.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLPP.L drawdown since its inception was -18.86%, smaller than the maximum SGLS.L drawdown of -21.94%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLPP.L and SGLS.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLPP.L | SGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.86% | -21.94% | +3.08% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -17.93% | +8.57% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.62% | -17.93% | +6.31% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.72% | -21.94% | +8.22% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.49% | -15.99% | +8.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -6.98% | +2.43% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 6.84% | -2.96% |
Volatility
XLPP.L vs. SGLS.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) and Invesco Physical Gold GBP Hedged ETC (SGLS.L) have volatilities of 6.28% and 6.40%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLPP.L | SGLS.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.28% | 6.40% | -0.12% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 21.65% | -9.93% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.19% | 24.68% | -10.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 17.91% | -4.56% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 18.29% | -3.86% |
XLPP.L vs. SGLS.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLPP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than SGLS.L's 0.34% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLPP.L vs. SGLS.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLPP.L nor SGLS.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLPP.L and SGLS.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLPP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLPP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.34% for SGLS.L.
XLPP.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while SGLS.L is Precious Metals. XLPP.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while SGLS.L tracks Gold (GBP Hedged). Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLPP.L and 0.34% for SGLS.L.
Find the right allocation for XLPP.L and SGLS.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer