XLPP.L vs. IGDA.L
XLPP.L (Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF) and IGDA.L (Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - XLPP.L is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while IGDA.L is a Global Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, XLPP.L returned 5.55%/yr vs 18.37%/yr for IGDA.L. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLPP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for IGDA.L.
Performance
XLPP.L vs. IGDA.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
XLPP.L is traded in GBp, while IGDA.L is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IGDA.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLPP.L achieves a 6.46% return, which is significantly lower than IGDA.L's 16.03% return.
XLPP.L
- 1D
- 0.10%
- 1M
- -1.92%
- YTD
- 6.46%
- 6M
- 6.19%
- 1Y
- 3.14%
- 3Y*
- 5.55%
- 5Y*
- 7.90%
- 10Y*
- 8.36%
IGDA.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 7.78%
- YTD
- 16.03%
- 6M
- 15.65%
- 1Y
- 36.74%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLPP.L vs. IGDA.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLPP.L Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF | 6.46% | -2.88% | 15.99% | -5.68% | 13.87% |
IGDA.L Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc | 15.51% | 10.28% | 20.00% | 23.23% | -5.03% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLPP.L and IGDA.L is -0.14, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.14 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 31, 2022 | 0.16 |
The correlation between XLPP.L and IGDA.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLPP.L vs. IGDA.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLPP.L
IGDA.L
Consumer Cyclical
Technology
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLPP.L
IGDA.L
Technology
XLPP.L
IGDA.L
Industrials
XLPP.L
IGDA.L
Basic Materials
XLPP.L
-
IGDA.L
Communication Services
XLPP.L
-
IGDA.L
Consumer Defensive
XLPP.L
-
IGDA.L
Energy
XLPP.L
-
IGDA.L
Financial Services
XLPP.L
-
IGDA.L
Healthcare
XLPP.L
-
IGDA.L
Real Estate
XLPP.L
-
IGDA.L
Utilities
XLPP.L
-
IGDA.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLPP.L vs. IGDA.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLPP.L
IGDA.L
XLPP.L vs. IGDA.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) and Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLPP.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.46 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -3.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | 1.48 | -0.44 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.33 | 5.08 | -4.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.81 | 18.17 | -17.37 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLPP.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 2.68 | -2.46 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.72 | 0.92 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
XLPP.L vs. IGDA.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLPP.L drawdown since its inception was -18.86%, smaller than the maximum IGDA.L drawdown of -22.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLPP.L and IGDA.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLPP.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.86% | -22.43% | +3.57% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.36% | -7.20% | -2.16% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -11.62% | -22.43% | +10.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -13.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.49% | -0.43% | -7.06% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -4.55% | -3.93% | -0.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.88% | 2.02% | +1.86% |
Volatility
XLPP.L vs. IGDA.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) has a higher volatility of 6.28% compared to Invesco Dow Jones Islamic Global Developed Markets UCITS ETF USD Acc (IGDA.L) at 4.57%. This indicates that XLPP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IGDA.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLPP.L | IGDA.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.28% | 4.57% | +1.71% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.72% | 10.31% | +1.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.19% | 13.67% | +0.52% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.35% | 17.32% | -3.97% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.43% | 17.32% | -2.89% |
XLPP.L vs. IGDA.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLPP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than IGDA.L's 0.40% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLPP.L vs. IGDA.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLPP.L nor IGDA.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLPP.L and IGDA.L have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLPP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLPP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for IGDA.L.
XLPP.L is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while IGDA.L is Global Equities. XLPP.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while IGDA.L tracks Dow Jones Islamic Market Developed Markets Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLPP.L and 0.40% for IGDA.L.
Find the right allocation for XLPP.L and IGDA.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer