XLPP.L vs. CSTP.L

Last updated Jul 18, 2026

XLPP.L (Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF) and CSTP.L (State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - XLPP.L tracks the Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR while CSTP.L tracks the MSCI Europe Consumer Staples 35/20 Capped Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLPP.L returned 7.34%/yr vs 3.81%/yr for CSTP.L. A 0.57 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLPP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.18%/yr for CSTP.L.

Performance

XLPP.L vs. CSTP.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSTP.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

XLPP.L is traded in GBp, while CSTP.L is traded in EUR. To make them comparable, the CSTP.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLPP.L achieves a 10.86% return, which is significantly higher than CSTP.L's 5.20% return. Over the past 10 years, XLPP.L has outperformed CSTP.L with an annualized return of 7.34%, while CSTP.L has yielded a comparatively lower 3.81% annualized return.

XLPP.L

• 1D: 1.47%
• 1M: 0.98%
• 6M: 5.33%
• YTD: 10.86%
• 1Y: 9.22%
• 3Y*: 8.05%
• 5Y*: 8.12%
• 10Y*: 7.34%

CSTP.L

• 1D: 0.89%
• 1M: 4.38%
• 6M: 5.57%
• YTD: 5.20%
• 1Y: 8.63%
• 3Y*: 2.72%
• 5Y*: 2.01%
• 10Y*: 3.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLPP.L vs. CSTP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLPP.L Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF	10.86%	-2.88%	15.99%	-5.68%	11.45%	19.81%	5.47%	22.94%	-4.95%	3.10%
CSTP.L State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF	5.20%	12.89%	-6.80%	-1.33%	-3.12%	13.11%	2.22%	17.61%	-8.07%	13.80%

Correlation

The correlation between XLPP.L and CSTP.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.60
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.49
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.50
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.56
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 9, 2014	0.57

The correlation between XLPP.L and CSTP.L shifts across timeframes, from 0.49 (3 years) to 0.60 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XLPP.L vs. CSTP.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLPP.L

XLPP.L Risk / Return Rank: 22
XLPP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 22
XLPP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 22
XLPP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 19
XLPP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 26
XLPP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 23

CSTP.L

CSTP.L Risk / Return Rank: 25
CSTP.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
CSTP.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 27
CSTP.L Omega Ratio Rank: 26
CSTP.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
CSTP.L Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLPP.L vs. CSTP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSTP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLPP.L	CSTP.L	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.61	0.60	+0.01
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.99	0.96	+0.03
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.12	-0.01
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.98	0.64	+0.34
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	2.18	1.37	+0.82

XLPP.L vs. CSTP.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLPP.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.61, which is comparable to the CSTP.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLPP.L and CSTP.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLPP.L vs. CSTP.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLPP.L drawdown since its inception was -18.63%, smaller than the maximum CSTP.L drawdown of -23.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLPP.L and CSTP.L.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLPP.L	CSTP.L	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-18.63%	-23.51%	+4.88%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.36%	-13.44%	+4.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-11.62%	-13.44%	+1.82%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-13.72%	-17.87%	+4.15%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-18.63%	-23.51%	+4.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.67%	-5.08%	+1.41%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-4.54%	-6.56%	+2.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.21%	6.31%	-2.10%

Volatility

XLPP.L vs. CSTP.L - Volatility Comparison

Invesco US Consumer Staples Sector UCITS ETF (XLPP.L) and State Street SPDR MSCI Europe Consumer Staples UCITS ETF (CSTP.L) have volatilities of 5.73% and 5.51%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLPP.L	CSTP.L	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.73%	5.51%	+0.22%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.49%	11.91%	+0.58%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	15.08%	14.38%	+0.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.59%	13.14%	+0.45%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.15%	13.96%	+0.19%

XLPP.L vs. CSTP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLPP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is lower than CSTP.L's 0.18% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLPP.L vs. CSTP.L - Dividend Comparison

Neither XLPP.L nor CSTP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLPP.L and CSTP.L in my portfolio?

XLPP.L and CSTP.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLPP.L or CSTP.L?

On fees, XLPP.L is cheaper at 0.14% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLPP.L or CSTP.L?

XLPP.L is cheaper with a 0.14% expense ratio, compared with 0.18% for CSTP.L.

What is the main difference between XLPP.L and CSTP.L?

XLPP.L tracks Cat 50%MSCI Wld/CD NR&50%MSCI Wld/CS NR, while CSTP.L tracks MSCI Europe Consumer Staples 35/20 Capped Index. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and State Street. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLPP.L and 0.18% for CSTP.L.