XLP vs. XRT
XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) and XRT (SPDR S&P Retail ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while XRT is a Consumer Discretionary Equities fund tracking the S&P Retail Select Industry. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLP returned 7.60%/yr vs 9.52%/yr for XRT. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLP charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XRT.
Performance
XLP vs. XRT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly higher than XRT's 3.14% return. Over the past 10 years, XLP has underperformed XRT with an annualized return of 7.60%, while XRT has yielded a comparatively higher 9.52% annualized return.
XLP
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- 0.99%
- YTD
- 11.10%
- 6M
- 9.54%
- 1Y
- 8.93%
- 3Y*
- 8.26%
- 5Y*
- 6.65%
- 10Y*
- 7.60%
XRT
- 1D
- 0.07%
- 1M
- 9.14%
- YTD
- 3.14%
- 6M
- 0.29%
- 1Y
- 17.43%
- 3Y*
- 12.80%
- 5Y*
- -0.36%
- 10Y*
- 9.52%
XLP vs. XRT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 11.10% | 1.52% | 12.20% | -0.82% | -0.81% | 17.20% | 10.11% | 27.43% | -8.07% | 12.98% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 3.14% | 8.07% | 11.78% | 21.53% | -31.64% | 42.60% | 41.91% | 14.12% | -8.04% | 4.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLP and XRT is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.41 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 22, 2006 | 0.50 |
The correlation between XLP and XRT shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (1 year) to 0.50 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLP vs. XRT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLP
XRT
Consumer Defensive
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Consumer Defensive
XLP
XRT
Consumer Cyclical
XLP
XRT
Basic Materials
XLP
-
XRT
-
Communication Services
XLP
-
XRT
Energy
XLP
-
XRT
Financial Services
XLP
-
XRT
-
Healthcare
XLP
-
XRT
Industrials
XLP
-
XRT
-
Real Estate
XLP
-
XRT
-
Technology
XLP
-
XRT
Utilities
XLP
-
XRT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLP vs. XRT — Risk / Return Rank
XLP
XRT
XLP vs. XRT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLP | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.12 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.25 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.13 | -0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.79 | 1.09 | -0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.52 | 2.48 | -0.96 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLP vs. XRT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, smaller than the maximum XRT drawdown of -65.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and XRT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLP | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.90% | -65.81% | +29.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.69% | -13.53% | +3.84% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.39% | -25.62% | +13.23% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.30% | -44.57% | +28.27% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.51% | -47.02% | +22.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.12% | -9.32% | +5.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -14.99% | +7.93% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.01% | 5.92% | -0.91% |
Volatility
XLP vs. XRT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) is 4.53%, while SPDR S&P Retail ETF (XRT) has a volatility of 5.73%. This indicates that XLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XRT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLP | XRT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.53% | 5.73% | -1.20% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.14% | 13.90% | -3.76% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.90% | 20.59% | -7.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.34% | 26.91% | -13.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.75% | 27.17% | -12.42% |
XLP vs. XRT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLP has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XRT's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLP vs. XRT - Dividend Comparison
XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, more than XRT's 0.79% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.53% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
XRT SPDR S&P Retail ETF | 0.79% | 0.77% | 1.52% | 1.40% | 2.15% | 1.55% | 1.01% | 1.57% | 1.51% | 1.52% | 1.36% | 1.30% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLP and XRT have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XRT has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to XLP (4.53%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLP dropped -35.90% vs XRT's -65.81%.
On 10-year performance, XRT leads with 9.52% vs 7.60% for XLP. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.53%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XRT has performed better with a 9.52% return vs 7.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XRT.
XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.53%, compared with 0.79% for XRT.
XLP is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while XRT is Consumer Discretionary Equities. XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while XRT tracks S&P Retail Select Industry. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLP and 0.35% for XRT.
XRT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLP and XRT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer