PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLP vs. PKB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLP vs. PKB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 10.66% return, which is significantly lower than PKB's 16.22% return. Over the past 10 years, XLP has underperformed PKB with an annualized return of 7.58%, while PKB has yielded a comparatively higher 15.86% annualized return.


XLP

1D
-0.40%
1M
0.99%
YTD
10.66%
6M
8.80%
1Y
8.50%
3Y*
7.50%
5Y*
6.92%
10Y*
7.58%

PKB

1D
1.66%
1M
5.36%
YTD
16.22%
6M
11.91%
1Y
39.97%
3Y*
28.24%
5Y*
17.52%
10Y*
15.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLP vs. PKB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
10.66%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%-8.07%12.98%
PKB
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF
16.22%22.47%20.24%55.29%-24.88%32.96%24.49%40.15%-31.11%24.67%

Correlation

The correlation between XLP and PKB is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.15

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.24

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.40

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2005

0.50

Over the past year, the correlation between XLP and PKB has dropped to 0.15 - well below their long-term average of 0.50, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLP vs. PKB - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLP
PKB

Consumer Defensive

99.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

1.0%
19.4%

Basic Materials

-

36.5%

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

2.4%

Financial Services

-

0.1%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

41.7%

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

3.0%

Consumer Defensive

XLP
99.0%
PKB

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLP
1.0%
PKB
19.4%

Basic Materials

XLP

-

PKB
36.5%

Communication Services

XLP

-

PKB

-

Energy

XLP

-

PKB
2.4%

Financial Services

XLP

-

PKB
0.1%

Healthcare

XLP

-

PKB

-

Industrials

XLP

-

PKB
41.7%

Real Estate

XLP

-

PKB

-

Technology

XLP

-

PKB

-

Utilities

XLP

-

PKB
3.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLP vs. PKB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

PKB
PKB Risk / Return Rank: 5353
Overall Rank
PKB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5454
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PKB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5555
Sortino Ratio Rank
PKB Omega Ratio Rank: 4848
Omega Ratio Rank
PKB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
PKB Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLP vs. PKB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLPPKBDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.03

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.38

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.12

1.28

-0.16

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.88

2.61

-1.72

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.70

8.26

-6.56

XLP vs. PKB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.67, which is lower than the PKB Sharpe Ratio of 1.69. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLP and PKB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLP vs. PKB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, smaller than the maximum PKB drawdown of -65.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and PKB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLPPKBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-35.90%

-65.21%

+29.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.69%

-15.41%

+5.72%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-12.39%

-29.75%

+17.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.30%

-34.85%

+18.55%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.51%

-52.29%

+27.78%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.50%

-2.73%

-1.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.06%

-15.75%

+8.69%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.02%

4.85%

+0.17%

Volatility

XLP vs. PKB - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) is 4.55%, while Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF (PKB) has a volatility of 8.82%. This indicates that XLP experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PKB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLPPKBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.55%

8.82%

-4.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.13%

18.70%

-8.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.85%

23.78%

-10.93%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.34%

25.79%

-12.45%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

14.75%

27.30%

-12.55%

XLP vs. PKB - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLP has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than PKB's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLP vs. PKB - Dividend Comparison

XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than PKB's 0.14% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
PKB
Invesco Dynamic Building & Construction ETF
0.14%0.14%0.23%0.33%0.43%0.25%0.30%0.37%0.54%0.17%0.31%0.11%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLP and PKB have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

PKB has higher volatility (8.82%) compared to XLP (4.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLP dropped -35.90% vs PKB's -65.21%.

On 10-year performance, PKB leads with 15.86% vs 7.58% for XLP. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLP has been the lower-risk option at 4.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, PKB has performed better with a 15.86% return vs 7.58%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for PKB.

XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.14% for PKB.

XLP is categorized as Consumer Staples Equities, while PKB is Building & Construction. XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while PKB tracks Dynamic Building & Construction Intellidex Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Invesco. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLP and 0.60% for PKB.

PKB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.69 vs 0.67), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLP and PKB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer