XLP vs. GXPS
Compare and contrast key facts about State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS).
XLP and GXPS are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLP is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Consumer Staples Select Sector. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. GXPS is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index. It was launched on Jul 22, 2025. Both XLP and GXPS are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XLP vs. GXPS - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XLP vs. GXPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 6.13% | -3.44% |
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 7.90% | -1.72% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 6.13% return, which is significantly lower than GXPS's 7.90% return.
XLP
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- -8.41%
- YTD
- 6.13%
- 6M
- 6.04%
- 1Y
- 3.16%
- 3Y*
- 5.99%
- 5Y*
- 6.59%
- 10Y*
- 7.17%
GXPS
- 1D
- 0.02%
- 1M
- -7.32%
- YTD
- 7.90%
- 6M
- 7.86%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLP vs. GXPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLP has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GXPS's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XLP vs. GXPS — Risk / Return Rank
XLP
GXPS
XLP vs. GXPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLP | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.23 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.42 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.05 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.49 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.19 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLP | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.23 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.44 | 0.67 | -0.23 |
Correlation
The correlation between XLP and GXPS is 0.94, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
XLP vs. GXPS - Dividend Comparison
XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than GXPS's 0.55% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.65% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 0.55% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XLP vs. GXPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, which is greater than GXPS's maximum drawdown of -9.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and GXPS.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLP | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.90% | -9.20% | -26.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.41% | -7.32% | -1.09% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -3.40% | -3.66% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.03% | — | — |
Volatility
XLP vs. GXPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XLP | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.34% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.90% | 13.37% | +0.53% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.14% | 13.37% | -0.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.69% | 13.37% | +1.32% |