XLP vs. GXPS
XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) and GXPS (Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF) are both Consumer Staples Equities funds - XLP tracks the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index while GXPS tracks the MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index. Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.95 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLP charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.25%/yr for GXPS.
Performance
XLP vs. GXPS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 6.21% return, which is significantly lower than GXPS's 6.95% return.
XLP
- 1D
- -0.15%
- 1M
- -2.40%
- YTD
- 6.21%
- 6M
- 6.01%
- 1Y
- 2.54%
- 3Y*
- 6.67%
- 5Y*
- 5.52%
- 10Y*
- 7.17%
GXPS
- 1D
- -0.18%
- 1M
- -3.77%
- YTD
- 6.95%
- 6M
- 6.56%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLP vs. GXPS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 6.21% | -3.44% |
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 6.95% | -1.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLP and GXPS is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025 | 0.95 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLP vs. GXPS — Risk / Return Rank
XLP
GXPS
XLP vs. GXPS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF (GXPS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLP | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.26 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.52 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLP | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.42 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.49 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.43 | 0.43 | +0.01 |
Drawdowns
XLP vs. GXPS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, which is greater than GXPS's maximum drawdown of -9.20%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and GXPS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLP | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -35.90% | -9.20% | -26.70% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.69% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -12.39% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.30% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -24.51% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.34% | -8.14% | -0.20% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.06% | -3.89% | -3.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.94% | — | — |
Volatility
XLP vs. GXPS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLP | GXPS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.90% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.84% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 12.66% | 13.94% | -1.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.29% | 13.94% | -0.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 14.73% | 13.94% | +0.79% |
XLP vs. GXPS - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLP has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than GXPS's 0.25% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLP vs. GXPS - Dividend Comparison
XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, more than GXPS's 0.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
GXPS Global X PureCap MSCI Consumer Staples ETF | 0.56% | 0.59% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.65% | 2.75% | 2.77% | 2.63% | 2.47% | 2.28% | 2.50% | 2.57% | 3.04% | 2.62% | 2.53% | 2.52% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, XLP and GXPS move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.25% for GXPS.
XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.65%, compared with 0.56% for GXPS.
XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while GXPS tracks MSCI USA Consumer Staples Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLP and 0.25% for GXPS.
Find the right allocation for XLP and GXPS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer