XLP vs. FCFAX

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XLP (State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF) and FCFAX (Frost Credit Fund) are both funds - XLP is a Consumer Staples Equities fund tracking the Consumer Staples Select Sector Index, while FCFAX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Frost Funds. Over the past 10 years, XLP returned 7.60%/yr vs 5.17%/yr for FCFAX. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLP charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for FCFAX.

Performance

XLP vs. FCFAX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLP achieves a 11.10% return, which is significantly higher than FCFAX's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, XLP has outperformed FCFAX with an annualized return of 7.60%, while FCFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.17% annualized return.

XLP

• 1D: 0.65%
• 1M: 1.39%
• YTD: 11.10%
• 6M: 9.54%
• 1Y: 8.93%
• 3Y*: 8.26%
• 5Y*: 6.65%
• 10Y*: 7.60%

FCFAX

• 1D: 0.33%
• 1M: 1.05%
• YTD: 1.58%
• 6M: 1.88%
• 1Y: 4.78%
• 3Y*: 7.23%
• 5Y*: 3.79%
• 10Y*: 5.17%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLP vs. FCFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF	11.10%	1.52%	12.20%	-0.82%	-0.81%	17.20%	10.11%	27.43%	-8.07%	12.98%
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund	1.58%	5.21%	8.01%	11.23%	-7.83%	5.07%	6.22%	6.95%	0.89%	7.95%

Correlation

The correlation between XLP and FCFAX is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.18
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.23
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013	0.16

Return for Risk

XLP vs. FCFAX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLP

XLP Risk / Return Rank: 19
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 20
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 18
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 20
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 17

FCFAX

FCFAX Risk / Return Rank: 73
FCFAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 77
FCFAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
FCFAX Omega Ratio Rank: 79
FCFAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
FCFAX Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLP vs. FCFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLP	FCFAX	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.59	2.13	-1.54
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.94	3.26	-2.33
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.11	1.43	-0.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.79	2.65	-1.86
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.52	9.89	-8.37

XLP vs. FCFAX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLP Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the FCFAX Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLP and FCFAX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLP vs. FCFAX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLP drawdown since its inception was -35.90%, which is greater than FCFAX's maximum drawdown of -16.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLP and FCFAX.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLP	FCFAX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-35.90%	-16.33%	-19.57%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-9.69%	-1.82%	-7.87%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-12.39%	-2.82%	-9.57%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-16.30%	-10.49%	-5.81%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-24.51%	-16.33%	-8.18%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.12%	0.00%	-4.12%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.06%	-1.53%	-5.53%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.01%	0.49%	+4.52%

Volatility

XLP vs. FCFAX - Volatility Comparison

State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) has a higher volatility of 4.53% compared to Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) at 0.77%. This indicates that XLP's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLP	FCFAX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	4.53%	0.77%	+3.76%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.14%	1.76%	+8.38%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.90%	2.27%	+10.63%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	13.34%	2.77%	+10.57%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	14.75%	3.24%	+11.51%

XLP vs. FCFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLP has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FCFAX's 0.96% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLP vs. FCFAX - Dividend Comparison

XLP's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.53%, less than FCFAX's 6.15% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund	6.15%	6.10%	5.76%	5.93%	5.00%	3.65%	3.69%	4.62%	5.05%	5.85%	4.84%	4.95%
XLP State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.53%	2.75%	2.77%	2.63%	2.47%	2.28%	2.50%	2.57%	3.04%	2.62%	2.53%	2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLP and FCFAX in my portfolio?

XLP and FCFAX have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLP or FCFAX?

XLP has higher volatility (4.53%) compared to FCFAX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLP dropped -35.90% vs FCFAX's -16.33%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FCFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.