PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLM-USD vs. VICI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XLM-USD vs. VICI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Stellar (XLM-USD) and VICI Properties Inc. (VICI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLM-USD achieves a -6.87% return, which is significantly lower than VICI's 3.07% return.


XLM-USD

1D
-1.52%
1M
15.17%
YTD
-6.87%
6M
-21.39%
1Y
-28.35%
3Y*
33.09%
5Y*
-11.45%
10Y*
60.23%

VICI

1D
1.53%
1M
2.30%
YTD
3.07%
6M
2.76%
1Y
-5.76%
3Y*
1.53%
5Y*
2.53%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLM-USD vs. VICI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLM-USD
Stellar
-6.87%-39.55%157.40%81.66%-73.35%108.68%184.76%-60.36%-68.37%866.50%
VICI
VICI Properties Inc.
3.07%1.90%-3.07%3.58%13.01%23.77%6.00%43.23%-3.62%10.51%

Correlation

The correlation between XLM-USD and VICI is 0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.05

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 17, 2017

0.10

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLM-USD vs. VICI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLM-USD
XLM-USD Risk / Return Rank: 7777
Overall Rank
XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 7777
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLM-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank

VICI
VICI Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
VICI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VICI Sortino Ratio Rank: 2121
Sortino Ratio Rank
VICI Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
VICI Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
VICI Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLM-USD vs. VICI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stellar (XLM-USD) and VICI Properties Inc. (VICI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLM-USDVICIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.52

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.00

0.94

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.40

-0.40

0.00

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.57

-0.67

+0.10

XLM-USD vs. VICI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLM-USD Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is comparable to the VICI Sharpe Ratio of -0.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLM-USD and VICI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLM-USD vs. VICI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLM-USD drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, which is greater than VICI's maximum drawdown of -60.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLM-USD and VICI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLM-USDVICIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.21%

-60.21%

-36.00%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-71.19%

-17.88%

-53.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.37%

-17.88%

-56.49%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-83.25%

-18.61%

-64.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-96.21%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-78.80%

-11.98%

-66.82%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-72.14%

-8.18%

-63.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

50.48%

10.61%

+39.87%

Volatility

XLM-USD vs. VICI - Volatility Comparison

Stellar (XLM-USD) has a higher volatility of 43.48% compared to VICI Properties Inc. (VICI) at 5.69%. This indicates that XLM-USD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VICI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLM-USDVICIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

43.48%

5.69%

+37.79%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

59.28%

12.90%

+46.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

70.60%

16.83%

+53.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

74.72%

21.00%

+53.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

112.79%

29.27%

+83.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLM-USD and VICI have a correlation of 0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLM-USD has higher volatility (43.48%) compared to VICI (5.69%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLM-USD dropped -96.21% vs VICI's -60.21%.

XLM-USD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.33 vs -0.42), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLM-USD and VICI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer