XLM-USD vs. RGTI
XLM-USD (Stellar) is a cryptocurrency, while RGTI (Rigetti Computing Inc) is a stock. Over the past 5 years, XLM-USD returned -11.45%/yr vs 16.53%/yr for RGTI. At a 0.13 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
XLM-USD vs. RGTI - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLM-USD achieves a -6.87% return, which is significantly lower than RGTI's -5.28% return.
XLM-USD
- 1D
- -1.52%
- 1M
- 15.17%
- YTD
- -6.87%
- 6M
- -21.39%
- 1Y
- -28.35%
- 3Y*
- 33.09%
- 5Y*
- -11.45%
- 10Y*
- 60.23%
RGTI
- 1D
- 1.70%
- 1M
- 8.87%
- YTD
- -5.28%
- 6M
- -18.81%
- 1Y
- 84.04%
- 3Y*
- 152.06%
- 5Y*
- 16.53%
- 10Y*
- —
XLM-USD vs. RGTI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLM-USD Stellar | -6.87% | -39.55% | 157.40% | 81.66% | -73.35% | -45.56% |
RGTI Rigetti Computing Inc | -5.28% | 45.15% | 1,449.40% | 35.07% | -92.91% | 3.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLM-USD and RGTI is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.13 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.14 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 22, 2021 | 0.13 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLM-USD vs. RGTI — Risk / Return Rank
XLM-USD
RGTI
XLM-USD vs. RGTI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Stellar (XLM-USD) and Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLM-USD | RGTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.75 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.00 | 1.19 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.40 | 0.96 | -1.36 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.57 | 1.47 | -2.04 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLM-USD vs. RGTI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLM-USD drawdown since its inception was -96.21%, roughly equal to the maximum RGTI drawdown of -96.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLM-USD and RGTI.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLM-USD | RGTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.21% | -96.89% | +0.68% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -71.19% | -77.10% | +5.91% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -74.37% | -78.83% | +4.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -83.25% | -96.89% | +13.64% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -96.21% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -78.80% | -62.76% | -16.04% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -72.14% | -58.84% | -13.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.48% | 49.98% | +0.50% |
Volatility
XLM-USD vs. RGTI - Volatility Comparison
Stellar (XLM-USD) and Rigetti Computing Inc (RGTI) have volatilities of 43.48% and 44.79%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLM-USD | RGTI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 43.48% | 44.79% | -1.31% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 59.28% | 71.15% | -11.87% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 70.60% | 109.21% | -38.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 74.72% | 128.97% | -54.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 112.79% | 127.17% | -14.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLM-USD and RGTI have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RGTI has higher volatility (44.79%) compared to XLM-USD (43.48%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLM-USD dropped -96.21% vs RGTI's -96.89%.
RGTI currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.68 vs -0.33), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLM-USD and RGTI
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer