XLKI vs. QTUM

Last updated Jul 12, 2026

XLKI (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and QTUM (Defiance Quantum ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. XLKI is actively managed, while QTUM is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.85 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLKI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.40%/yr for QTUM.

Performance

XLKI vs. QTUM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLKI achieves a 15.15% return, which is significantly lower than QTUM's 41.37% return.

XLKI

• 1D: 0.28%
• 1M: 1.80%
• 6M: 13.70%
• YTD: 15.15%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QTUM

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: -4.08%
• 6M: 33.03%
• YTD: 41.37%
• 1Y: 69.29%
• 3Y*: 46.36%
• 5Y*: 26.92%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLKI vs. QTUM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	15.15%	10.02%
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	41.37%	18.09%

Correlation

The correlation between XLKI and QTUM is 0.85, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025	0.85

XLKI vs. QTUM - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLKI	QTUM
Technology	99.0%	81.2%
Financial Services	98.0%	0.0%
Communication Services	1.0%	6.4%
Basic Materials	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	2.0%
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	1.2%
Industrials	-	9.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLKI vs. QTUM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLKI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

QTUM

QTUM Risk / Return Rank: 84
QTUM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
QTUM Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
QTUM Omega Ratio Rank: 77
QTUM Calmar Ratio Rank: 90
QTUM Martin Ratio Rank: 88

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLKI vs. QTUM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLKI) and Defiance Quantum ETF (QTUM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLKI	QTUM	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	2.23	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.76	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.36	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	4.41	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	14.97	—

Drawdowns

XLKI vs. QTUM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLKI drawdown since its inception was -10.24%, smaller than the maximum QTUM drawdown of -38.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLKI and QTUM.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLKI	QTUM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-10.24%	-38.45%	+28.21%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-15.26%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-25.39%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-38.45%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.95%	-8.32%	+5.37%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.89%	-8.21%	+6.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	4.49%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XLKI	QTUM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	12.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	24.81%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.09%	30.13%	-11.04%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.09%	27.38%	-8.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.09%	27.55%	-8.46%

XLKI vs. QTUM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLKI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QTUM's 0.40% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLKI vs. QTUM - Dividend Comparison

XLKI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.21%, more than QTUM's 0.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018
QTUM Defiance Quantum ETF	0.76%	1.01%	0.61%	0.81%	1.46%	0.48%	0.42%	0.61%	0.21%
XLKI State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	17.21%	8.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLKI and QTUM in my portfolio?

XLKI and QTUM have a correlation of 0.85, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLKI or QTUM?

On fees, XLKI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLKI or QTUM?

XLKI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.40% for QTUM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLKI or QTUM?

XLKI has the higher dividend yield at 17.21%, compared with 0.76% for QTUM.

What is the main difference between XLKI and QTUM?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLKI and 0.40% for QTUM.