XLK vs. XLC
XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) and XLC (Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while XLC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLK returned 19.66%/yr vs 7.29%/yr for XLC. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLK charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.13%/yr for XLC.
Performance
XLK vs. XLC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 25.87% return, which is significantly higher than XLC's -5.99% return.
XLK
- 1D
- 2.89%
- 1M
- -5.46%
- 6M
- 27.76%
- YTD
- 25.87%
- 1Y
- 39.13%
- 3Y*
- 27.93%
- 5Y*
- 19.66%
- 10Y*
- 24.24%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.34%
XLC
- 1D
- -0.69%
- 1M
- 0.79%
- 6M
- -2.47%
- YTD
- -5.99%
- 1Y
- 3.53%
- 3Y*
- 20.18%
- 5Y*
- 7.29%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 11.40%
XLK vs. XLC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 25.87% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -13.01% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | -5.99% | 23.08% | 34.71% | 52.82% | -37.63% | 15.96% | 26.90% | 31.05% | -16.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLK and XLC is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.68 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.73 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLK and XLC has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLK vs. XLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLK
XLC
Technology
Communication Services
Energy
-
Industrials
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
XLK
XLC
Communication Services
XLK
XLC
Energy
XLK
XLC
-
Industrials
XLK
XLC
-
Basic Materials
XLK
-
XLC
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLK
-
XLC
-
Consumer Defensive
XLK
-
XLC
-
Financial Services
XLK
-
XLC
-
Healthcare
XLK
-
XLC
-
Real Estate
XLK
-
XLC
-
Utilities
XLK
-
XLC
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLK vs. XLC — Risk / Return Rank
XLK
XLC
XLK vs. XLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLK | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.63 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.27 | 1.05 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.47 | 0.31 | +2.16 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.18 | 0.84 | +6.35 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLK vs. XLC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than XLC's maximum drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and XLC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLK | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -46.65% | -35.40% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -11.57% | -4.35% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -17.97% | -7.69% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.56% | -46.65% | +13.09% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.68% | -7.84% | -0.84% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.83% | -10.55% | -24.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.46% | 4.22% | +1.24% |
Volatility
XLK vs. XLC - Volatility Comparison
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 9.53% compared to Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) at 5.32%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLK | XLC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.53% | 5.32% | +4.21% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 21.11% | 11.11% | +10.00% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 24.72% | 13.95% | +10.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.60% | 20.79% | +4.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.82% | 22.13% | +2.69% |
XLK vs. XLC - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XLC's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLK vs. XLC - Dividend Comparison
XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than XLC's 1.30% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.30% | 1.13% | 0.99% | 0.82% | 1.10% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.82% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.44% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLK and XLC have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (9.53%) compared to XLC (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs XLC's -46.65%.
On 5-year performance, XLK leads with 19.66% vs 7.29% for XLC. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLC has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLK has performed better with a 19.66% return vs 7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLC.
XLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.44% for XLK.
XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLC is Communications Equities. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.13% for XLC.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLK and XLC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer