PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLK vs. XLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLK vs. XLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 25.87% return, which is significantly higher than XLC's -5.99% return.


XLK

1D
2.89%
1M
-5.46%
6M
27.76%
YTD
25.87%
1Y
39.13%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
19.66%
10Y*
24.24%
ALL TIME*
10.34%

XLC

1D
-0.69%
1M
0.79%
6M
-2.47%
YTD
-5.99%
1Y
3.53%
3Y*
20.18%
5Y*
7.29%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.40%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLK vs. XLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
25.87%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-13.01%
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
-5.99%23.08%34.71%52.82%-37.63%15.96%26.90%31.05%-16.45%

Correlation

The correlation between XLK and XLC is 0.31, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.31

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.55

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.68

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018

0.73

Over the past year, the correlation between XLK and XLC has dropped to 0.31 - well below their long-term average of 0.73, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLK vs. XLC - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLK
XLC

Technology

99.1%
8.7%

Communication Services

0.9%
91.2%

Energy

0.2%

-

Industrials

0.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

XLK
99.1%
XLC
8.7%

Communication Services

XLK
0.9%
XLC
91.2%

Energy

XLK
0.2%
XLC

-

Industrials

XLK
0.1%
XLC

-

Basic Materials

XLK

-

XLC

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLK

-

XLC

-

Consumer Defensive

XLK

-

XLC

-

Financial Services

XLK

-

XLC

-

Healthcare

XLK

-

XLC

-

Real Estate

XLK

-

XLC

-

Utilities

XLK

-

XLC

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLK vs. XLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5858
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 5959
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

XLC
XLC Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLC Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLC Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLK vs. XLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLKXLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.27

1.05

+0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.47

0.31

+2.16

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

7.18

0.84

+6.35

XLK vs. XLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLK Sharpe Ratio is 1.59, which is higher than the XLC Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLK and XLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLK vs. XLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than XLC's maximum drawdown of -46.65%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and XLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKXLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.05%

-46.65%

-35.40%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

-11.57%

-4.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-17.97%

-7.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

-46.65%

+13.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.68%

-7.84%

-0.84%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.83%

-10.55%

-24.28%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.46%

4.22%

+1.24%

Volatility

XLK vs. XLC - Volatility Comparison

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 9.53% compared to Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) at 5.32%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKXLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.53%

5.32%

+4.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

21.11%

11.11%

+10.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.72%

13.95%

+10.77%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.60%

20.79%

+4.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.82%

22.13%

+2.69%

XLK vs. XLC - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XLC's 0.13% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLK vs. XLC - Dividend Comparison

XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.44%, less than XLC's 1.30% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.30%1.13%0.99%0.82%1.10%0.74%0.68%0.82%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.44%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLK and XLC have a correlation of 0.31, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (9.53%) compared to XLC (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs XLC's -46.65%.

On 5-year performance, XLK leads with 19.66% vs 7.29% for XLC. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLC has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLK has performed better with a 19.66% return vs 7.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLC.

XLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.30%, compared with 0.44% for XLK.

XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while XLC is Communications Equities. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.13% for XLC.

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.59 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLK and XLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer