XLK vs. UHS

Last updated Jul 21, 2026

XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) is Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while UHS (Universal Health Services, Inc.) is a stock. Over the past 10 years, XLK returned 23.89%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for UHS. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

XLK vs. UHS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 22.34% return, which is significantly higher than UHS's -30.74% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed UHS with an annualized return of 23.89%, while UHS has yielded a comparatively lower 1.30% annualized return.

XLK

• 1D: 0.07%
• 1M: -8.11%
• 6M: 20.96%
• YTD: 22.34%
• 1Y: 35.41%
• 3Y*: 26.73%
• 5Y*: 19.16%
• 10Y*: 23.89%
• ALL TIME*: 10.23%

UHS

• 1D: -0.34%
• 1M: 6.71%
• 6M: -24.46%
• YTD: -30.74%
• 1Y: -10.45%
• 3Y*: 0.93%
• 5Y*: 0.13%
• 10Y*: 1.30%
• ALL TIME*: 14.89%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLK vs. UHS - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	22.34%	24.61%	21.63%	56.02%	-27.73%	34.74%	43.62%	49.86%	-1.68%	34.26%
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc.	-30.74%	22.02%	18.19%	8.83%	9.37%	-5.16%	-4.00%	23.62%	3.16%	6.93%

Correlation

The correlation between XLK and UHS is -0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.04
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.14
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.26
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998	0.28

The correlation between XLK and UHS shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (1 year) to 0.28 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

XLK vs. UHS — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLK

XLK Risk / Return Rank: 54
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 51
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 52
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 52

UHS

UHS Risk / Return Rank: 32
UHS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 31
UHS Sortino Ratio Rank: 29
UHS Omega Ratio Rank: 28
UHS Calmar Ratio Rank: 37
UHS Martin Ratio Rank: 36

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLK vs. UHS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLK	UHS	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.45	-0.32	+1.77
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.93	-0.24	+2.17
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	0.97	+0.28
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.23	-0.25	+2.48
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.53	-0.51	+7.04

XLK vs. UHS - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLK Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the UHS Sharpe Ratio of -0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLK and UHS, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLK vs. UHS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than UHS's maximum drawdown of -60.27%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and UHS.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLK	UHS	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-82.05%	-60.27%	-21.78%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-15.92%	-42.00%	+26.08%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.66%	-42.00%	+16.34%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-33.56%	-44.90%	+11.34%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-33.56%	-56.30%	+22.74%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-11.25%	-38.11%	+26.86%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.83%	-14.88%	-19.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	5.43%	20.71%	-15.28%

Volatility

XLK vs. UHS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) is 9.59%, while Universal Health Services, Inc. (UHS) has a volatility of 10.61%. This indicates that XLK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UHS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLK	UHS	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	9.59%	10.61%	-1.02%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	20.94%	26.29%	-5.35%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.61%	32.44%	-7.83%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.57%	31.94%	-6.37%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.81%	34.49%	-9.68%

Dividends

XLK vs. UHS - Dividend Comparison

XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than UHS's 0.53% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UHS Universal Health Services, Inc.	0.53%	0.37%	0.45%	0.52%	0.57%	0.62%	0.15%	0.42%	0.34%	0.35%	0.38%	0.33%
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF	0.45%	0.54%	0.66%	0.76%	1.04%	0.65%	0.92%	1.16%	1.60%	1.37%	1.74%	1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLK and UHS in my portfolio?

XLK and UHS have a correlation of -0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLK or UHS?

UHS has higher volatility (10.61%) compared to XLK (9.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs UHS's -60.27%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.45 vs -0.32), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.