PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLK vs. SPYV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLK vs. SPYV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 22.34% return, which is significantly higher than SPYV's 9.18% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed SPYV with an annualized return of 23.89%, while SPYV has yielded a comparatively lower 11.63% annualized return.


XLK

1D
0.07%
1M
-8.11%
6M
20.96%
YTD
22.34%
1Y
35.41%
3Y*
26.73%
5Y*
19.16%
10Y*
23.89%
ALL TIME*
10.23%

SPYV

1D
-0.65%
1M
1.51%
6M
6.61%
YTD
9.18%
1Y
18.51%
3Y*
13.76%
5Y*
11.49%
10Y*
11.63%
ALL TIME*
7.84%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLK vs. SPYV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
22.34%24.61%21.63%56.02%-27.73%34.74%43.62%49.86%-1.68%34.26%
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
9.18%13.18%12.24%22.20%-5.28%24.91%1.38%31.70%-9.01%15.40%

Correlation

The correlation between XLK and SPYV is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.44

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.63

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.63

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 2, 2000

0.65

Over the past year, the correlation between XLK and SPYV has dropped to 0.44 - well below their long-term average of 0.65, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLK vs. SPYV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLK
SPYV

Technology

99.1%
21.7%

Communication Services

0.9%
2.9%

Energy

0.2%
6.6%

Industrials

0.1%
10.9%

Basic Materials

-

3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

10.6%

Consumer Defensive

-

8.8%

Financial Services

-

15.1%

Healthcare

-

12.2%

Real Estate

-

3.3%

Utilities

-

4.5%

Technology

XLK
99.1%
SPYV
21.7%

Communication Services

XLK
0.9%
SPYV
2.9%

Energy

XLK
0.2%
SPYV
6.6%

Industrials

XLK
0.1%
SPYV
10.9%

Basic Materials

XLK

-

SPYV
3.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XLK

-

SPYV
10.6%

Consumer Defensive

XLK

-

SPYV
8.8%

Financial Services

XLK

-

SPYV
15.1%

Healthcare

XLK

-

SPYV
12.2%

Real Estate

XLK

-

SPYV
3.3%

Utilities

XLK

-

SPYV
4.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLK vs. SPYV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYV
SPYV Risk / Return Rank: 7979
Overall Rank
SPYV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7979
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYV Omega Ratio Rank: 7777
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYV Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYV Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLK vs. SPYV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLKSPYVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.43

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.72

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.25

1.34

-0.09

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

2.99

-0.75

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

6.53

11.36

-4.82

XLK vs. SPYV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLK Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is comparable to the SPYV Sharpe Ratio of 1.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLK and SPYV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLK vs. SPYV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than SPYV's maximum drawdown of -58.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and SPYV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKSPYVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.05%

-58.45%

-23.60%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

-6.22%

-9.70%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.66%

-17.54%

-8.12%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

-17.89%

-15.67%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

-36.89%

+3.33%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-11.25%

-1.16%

-10.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.83%

-8.68%

-26.15%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.43%

1.63%

+3.80%

Volatility

XLK vs. SPYV - Volatility Comparison

State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 9.59% compared to SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF (SPYV) at 2.10%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLKSPYVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.59%

2.10%

+7.49%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.94%

7.28%

+13.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

24.61%

9.93%

+14.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

25.57%

14.30%

+11.27%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.81%

16.88%

+7.93%

XLK vs. SPYV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYV's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLK vs. SPYV - Dividend Comparison

XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.45%, less than SPYV's 1.70% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYV
SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 Value ETF
1.70%1.77%2.29%1.75%2.22%2.10%2.38%2.25%2.97%2.77%2.39%2.53%
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.45%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLK and SPYV have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLK has higher volatility (9.59%) compared to SPYV (2.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs SPYV's -58.45%.

On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 23.89% vs 11.63% for SPYV. On fees, SPYV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SPYV has been the lower-risk option at 2.10%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 23.89% return vs 11.63%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLK.

SPYV has the higher dividend yield at 1.70%, compared with 0.45% for XLK.

XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while SPYV is S&P 500. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while SPYV tracks S&P 500 Value Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.04% for SPYV.

SPYV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.88 vs 1.45), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLK and SPYV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer