XLK vs. SDOG
XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) and SDOG (ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while SDOG is a Large Cap Value Equities fund tracking the S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLK returned 25.19%/yr vs 9.99%/yr for SDOG. A 0.54 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLK charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.36%/yr for SDOG.
Performance
XLK vs. SDOG - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly higher than SDOG's 17.13% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed SDOG with an annualized return of 25.19%, while SDOG has yielded a comparatively lower 9.99% annualized return.
XLK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 2.95%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 28.96%
- 1Y
- 55.42%
- 3Y*
- 30.28%
- 5Y*
- 22.02%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
SDOG
- 1D
- 1.26%
- 1M
- 5.43%
- YTD
- 17.13%
- 6M
- 16.28%
- 1Y
- 27.16%
- 3Y*
- 16.38%
- 5Y*
- 9.08%
- 10Y*
- 9.99%
XLK vs. SDOG - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.52% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 17.13% | 11.12% | 14.70% | 4.19% | -0.20% | 24.59% | -0.35% | 24.02% | -11.43% | 12.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLK and SDOG is 0.20, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.29 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.48 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 29, 2012 | 0.54 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLK and SDOG has dropped to 0.20 - well below their long-term average of 0.54, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLK vs. SDOG - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLK
SDOG
Technology
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XLK
SDOG
Energy
XLK
SDOG
Industrials
XLK
SDOG
Basic Materials
XLK
-
SDOG
Communication Services
XLK
-
SDOG
Consumer Cyclical
XLK
-
SDOG
Consumer Defensive
XLK
-
SDOG
Financial Services
XLK
-
SDOG
Healthcare
XLK
-
SDOG
Real Estate
XLK
-
SDOG
-
Utilities
XLK
-
SDOG
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLK vs. SDOG — Risk / Return Rank
XLK
SDOG
XLK vs. SDOG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLK | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.08 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.53 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.40 | -0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 4.25 | -0.89 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.85 | 13.63 | -2.78 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLK vs. SDOG - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than SDOG's maximum drawdown of -43.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and SDOG.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLK | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -43.56% | -38.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -6.24% | -9.68% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -16.00% | -9.66% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.56% | -19.84% | -13.72% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -43.56% | +10.00% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | 0.00% | -6.77% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.93% | -4.91% | -30.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | 1.94% | +2.98% |
Volatility
XLK vs. SDOG - Volatility Comparison
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 10.86% compared to ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF (SDOG) at 3.34%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SDOG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLK | SDOG | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.86% | 3.34% | +7.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.92% | 8.02% | +10.90% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.55% | 11.52% | +11.03% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.18% | 15.44% | +9.74% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.64% | 19.06% | +5.58% |
XLK vs. SDOG - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than SDOG's 0.36% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLK vs. SDOG - Dividend Comparison
XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than SDOG's 3.26% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SDOG ALPS Sector Dividend Dogs ETF | 3.26% | 3.68% | 3.86% | 4.29% | 3.87% | 3.62% | 3.63% | 3.37% | 4.03% | 3.27% | 3.32% | 3.61% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLK and SDOG have a correlation of 0.20, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (10.86%) compared to SDOG (3.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs SDOG's -43.56%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.19% vs 9.99% for SDOG. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, SDOG has been the lower-risk option at 3.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 9.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.36% for SDOG.
SDOG has the higher dividend yield at 3.26%, compared with 0.41% for XLK.
XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while SDOG is Large Cap Value Equities. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while SDOG tracks S-Network Sector Dividend Dogs Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and SS&C. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.36% for SDOG.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 2.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLK and SDOG
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer