XLK vs. SCHM
XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) and SCHM (Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while SCHM is a Mid Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLK returned 25.11%/yr vs 11.48%/yr for SCHM. A 0.74 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLK charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHM.
Performance
XLK vs. SCHM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 27.41% return, which is significantly higher than SCHM's 18.78% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed SCHM with an annualized return of 25.11%, while SCHM has yielded a comparatively lower 11.48% annualized return.
XLK
- 1D
- 3.73%
- 1M
- 4.57%
- YTD
- 27.41%
- 6M
- 24.16%
- 1Y
- 53.33%
- 3Y*
- 30.17%
- 5Y*
- 21.81%
- 10Y*
- 25.11%
SCHM
- 1D
- 2.98%
- 1M
- 3.25%
- YTD
- 18.78%
- 6M
- 15.85%
- 1Y
- 31.34%
- 3Y*
- 17.28%
- 5Y*
- 7.82%
- 10Y*
- 11.48%
XLK vs. SCHM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 27.41% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 18.78% | 10.17% | 11.98% | 16.69% | -17.07% | 19.36% | 15.26% | 27.48% | -8.77% | 19.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLK and SCHM is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 13, 2011 | 0.74 |
The correlation between XLK and SCHM shifts across timeframes, from 0.60 (1 year) to 0.74 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLK vs. SCHM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLK
SCHM
Technology
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XLK
SCHM
Energy
XLK
SCHM
Industrials
XLK
SCHM
Basic Materials
XLK
-
SCHM
Communication Services
XLK
-
SCHM
Consumer Cyclical
XLK
-
SCHM
Consumer Defensive
XLK
-
SCHM
Financial Services
XLK
-
SCHM
Healthcare
XLK
-
SCHM
Real Estate
XLK
-
SCHM
Utilities
XLK
-
SCHM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLK vs. SCHM — Risk / Return Rank
XLK
SCHM
XLK vs. SCHM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLK | SCHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.17 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.34 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.37 | 3.38 | -0.01 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.91 | 13.51 | -2.60 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLK vs. SCHM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than SCHM's maximum drawdown of -42.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and SCHM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLK | SCHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -42.43% | -39.62% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -9.32% | -6.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -23.27% | -2.39% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.56% | -26.46% | -7.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -42.43% | +8.87% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.57% | -0.39% | -7.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.93% | -5.65% | -29.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.90% | 2.33% | +2.57% |
Volatility
XLK vs. SCHM - Volatility Comparison
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 10.87% compared to Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF (SCHM) at 5.59%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLK | SCHM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.87% | 5.59% | +5.28% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.91% | 12.45% | +6.46% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.54% | 16.14% | +6.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.19% | 19.65% | +5.54% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.64% | 20.50% | +4.14% |
XLK vs. SCHM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHM's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLK vs. SCHM - Dividend Comparison
XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.42%, less than SCHM's 1.22% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHM Schwab US Mid-Cap ETF | 1.22% | 1.46% | 1.43% | 1.50% | 1.67% | 1.13% | 1.31% | 1.48% | 1.56% | 1.27% | 1.51% | 1.54% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.42% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLK and SCHM have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (10.87%) compared to SCHM (5.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs SCHM's -42.43%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.11% vs 11.48% for SCHM. On fees, SCHM is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHM has been the lower-risk option at 5.59%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.11% return vs 11.48%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHM is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLK.
SCHM has the higher dividend yield at 1.22%, compared with 0.42% for XLK.
XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while SCHM is Mid Cap Blend Equities. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while SCHM tracks Dow Jones US Total Stock Market Mid-Cap. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.04% for SCHM.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.38 vs 1.95), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLK and SCHM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer