XLK vs. FEZ
XLK (State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF) and FEZ (State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLK is a Technology Equities fund tracking the S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while FEZ is a Europe Equities fund tracking the EURO STOXX 50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLK returned 25.19%/yr vs 11.34%/yr for FEZ. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLK charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.29%/yr for FEZ.
Performance
XLK vs. FEZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a 28.52% return, which is significantly higher than FEZ's 7.29% return. Over the past 10 years, XLK has outperformed FEZ with an annualized return of 25.19%, while FEZ has yielded a comparatively lower 11.34% annualized return.
XLK
- 1D
- 0.87%
- 1M
- 4.50%
- YTD
- 28.52%
- 6M
- 28.96%
- 1Y
- 53.24%
- 3Y*
- 30.28%
- 5Y*
- 22.02%
- 10Y*
- 25.19%
FEZ
- 1D
- 0.09%
- 1M
- 4.00%
- YTD
- 7.29%
- 6M
- 8.07%
- 1Y
- 17.54%
- 3Y*
- 17.98%
- 5Y*
- 10.21%
- 10Y*
- 11.34%
XLK vs. FEZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 28.52% | 24.61% | 21.63% | 56.02% | -27.73% | 34.74% | 43.62% | 49.86% | -1.68% | 34.26% |
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 7.29% | 37.81% | 3.57% | 27.16% | -14.27% | 14.84% | 4.84% | 26.04% | -15.85% | 24.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLK and FEZ is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 21, 2002 | 0.66 |
The correlation between XLK and FEZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.66 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLK vs. FEZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLK
FEZ
Technology
Energy
Industrials
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XLK
FEZ
Energy
XLK
FEZ
Industrials
XLK
FEZ
Basic Materials
XLK
-
FEZ
Communication Services
XLK
-
FEZ
Consumer Cyclical
XLK
-
FEZ
Consumer Defensive
XLK
-
FEZ
Financial Services
XLK
-
FEZ
Healthcare
XLK
-
FEZ
Real Estate
XLK
-
FEZ
-
Utilities
XLK
-
FEZ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLK vs. FEZ — Risk / Return Rank
XLK
FEZ
XLK vs. FEZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLK | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.42 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.47 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.39 | 1.17 | +0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.36 | 1.29 | +2.07 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.85 | 4.40 | +6.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLK vs. FEZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than FEZ's maximum drawdown of -64.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and FEZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLK | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.05% | -64.21% | -17.84% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -15.92% | -13.63% | -2.29% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.66% | -15.85% | -9.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.56% | -35.05% | +1.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -33.56% | -39.69% | +6.13% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.77% | -0.37% | -6.40% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -34.93% | -17.05% | -17.88% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.92% | 4.01% | +0.91% |
Volatility
XLK vs. FEZ - Volatility Comparison
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) has a higher volatility of 10.86% compared to State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF (FEZ) at 6.57%. This indicates that XLK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FEZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLK | FEZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.86% | 6.57% | +4.29% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 18.92% | 15.48% | +3.44% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 22.55% | 18.45% | +4.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 25.18% | 20.70% | +4.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.64% | 21.11% | +3.53% |
XLK vs. FEZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FEZ's 0.29% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLK vs. FEZ - Dividend Comparison
XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.41%, less than FEZ's 2.52% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FEZ State Street SPDR EURO STOXX 50 ETF | 2.52% | 2.78% | 2.94% | 2.75% | 3.06% | 2.61% | 2.13% | 2.61% | 3.45% | 2.44% | 3.35% | 3.03% |
XLK State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF | 0.41% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.76% | 1.04% | 0.65% | 0.92% | 1.16% | 1.60% | 1.37% | 1.74% | 1.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLK and FEZ have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLK has higher volatility (10.86%) compared to FEZ (6.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLK dropped -82.05% vs FEZ's -64.21%.
On 10-year performance, XLK leads with 25.19% vs 11.34% for FEZ. On fees, XLK is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, FEZ has been the lower-risk option at 6.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLK has performed better with a 25.19% return vs 11.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLK is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.29% for FEZ.
FEZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.52%, compared with 0.41% for XLK.
XLK is categorized as Technology Equities, while FEZ is Europe Equities. XLK tracks S&P Technology Select Sector Daily Capped 35/20 Index, while FEZ tracks EURO STOXX 50 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLK and 0.29% for FEZ.
XLK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.37 vs 0.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLK and FEZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer