PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLK vs. ARMH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XLK vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XLK vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLK achieves a -5.43% return, which is significantly lower than ARMH's 42.50% return.


XLK

1D
0.80%
1M
-0.98%
YTD
-5.43%
6M
-4.69%
1Y
30.55%
3Y*
22.58%
5Y*
15.84%
10Y*
21.15%

ARMH

1D
1.80%
1M
25.03%
YTD
42.50%
6M
4.80%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XLK vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLK has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XLK vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLK
XLK Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XLK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLK Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLK Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
XLK Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLK Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank

ARMH
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLK vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLK) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLKARMHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.13

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.71

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.98

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

6.27

XLK vs. ARMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLKARMHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.13

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.64

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.85

-0.49

Correlation

The correlation between XLK and ARMH is 0.54, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Dividends

XLK vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

XLK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, less than ARMH's 2.37% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLK
State Street Technology Select Sector SPDR ETF
0.56%0.54%0.66%0.76%1.04%0.65%0.92%1.16%1.60%1.37%1.74%1.79%
ARMH
Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF
2.37%2.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

XLK vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLK drawdown since its inception was -82.05%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -42.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLK and ARMH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XLKARMHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.05%

-42.04%

-40.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-15.92%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-33.56%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.32%

-12.19%

+1.87%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-35.16%

-16.31%

-18.85%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.03%

Volatility

XLK vs. ARMH - Volatility Comparison


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XLKARMHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.05%

50.51%

-23.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.71%

50.51%

-25.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

24.33%

50.51%

-26.18%