PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLG vs. USSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLG vs. USSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLG achieves a 4.68% return, which is significantly lower than USSG's 12.11% return.


XLG

1D
1.74%
1M
1.81%
6M
4.68%
YTD
4.68%
1Y
17.86%
3Y*
21.61%
5Y*
14.02%
10Y*
16.44%
ALL TIME*
11.40%

USSG

1D
1.76%
1M
2.38%
6M
10.14%
YTD
12.11%
1Y
24.23%
3Y*
21.35%
5Y*
13.20%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
16.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.13M$1.02M$843.44K
$59.56M$59.06M$102.51M

XLG vs. USSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
4.68%19.51%33.49%38.16%-24.29%30.77%24.15%19.57%
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
12.11%18.97%23.45%29.17%-20.33%31.83%18.71%19.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XLG and USSG is 0.90, meaning they have usually moved in the same direction, including during past declines.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 7, 2019

0.94

The correlation between XLG and USSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLG vs. USSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLG
USSG

Technology

49.8%
35.5%

Communication Services

13.0%
12.8%

Financial Services

10.3%
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

9.3%
9.4%

Healthcare

6.8%
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

5.1%
5.3%

Energy

2.5%
1.9%

Industrials

1.9%
9.2%

Utilities

0.7%
1.0%

Basic Materials

0.6%
1.9%

Real Estate

-

2.0%

Technology

XLG
49.8%
USSG
35.5%

Communication Services

XLG
13.0%
USSG
12.8%

Financial Services

XLG
10.3%
USSG
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XLG
9.3%
USSG
9.4%

Healthcare

XLG
6.8%
USSG
10.3%

Consumer Defensive

XLG
5.1%
USSG
5.3%

Energy

XLG
2.5%
USSG
1.9%

Industrials

XLG
1.9%
USSG
9.2%

Utilities

XLG
0.7%
USSG
1.0%

Basic Materials

XLG
0.6%
USSG
1.9%

Real Estate

XLG

-

USSG
2.0%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLG vs. USSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XLG
XLG Risk / Return Rank: 4545
Overall Rank
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4949
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 4747
Omega Ratio Rank
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4141
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 4242
Martin Ratio Rank

USSG
USSG Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
USSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
USSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5959
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSG Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XLG vs. USSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLGUSSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.50

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.68

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.22

1.30

-0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.44

2.17

-0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.49

8.91

-4.41

XLG vs. USSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLG Sharpe Ratio is 1.22, which is comparable to the USSG Sharpe Ratio of 1.72. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLG and USSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLG vs. USSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than USSG's maximum drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and USSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLGUSSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.39%

-34.10%

-18.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-11.20%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.70%

-20.00%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.02%

-27.00%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-4.09%

0.00%

-4.09%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.62%

-5.51%

-2.11%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.98%

2.73%

+1.25%

Volatility

XLG vs. USSG - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a higher volatility of 5.30% compared to Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) at 4.34%. This indicates that XLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than USSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLGUSSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

4.34%

+0.96%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.66%

11.32%

+0.34%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.73%

14.18%

+0.55%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.91%

17.76%

+1.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.93%

20.09%

-1.16%

XLG vs. USSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than USSG's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLG vs. USSG - Dividend Comparison

XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.64%, less than USSG's 0.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
0.96%1.02%1.13%1.60%1.52%1.13%1.42%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
0.64%0.64%0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLG and USSG have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLG has higher volatility (5.30%) compared to USSG (4.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLG dropped -52.39% vs USSG's -34.10%.

On 5-year performance, XLG leads with 14.02% vs 13.20% for USSG. On fees, USSG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, USSG has been the lower-risk option at 4.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLG has performed better with a 14.02% return vs 13.20%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USSG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.

USSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.64% for XLG.

XLG is categorized as S&P 500, while USSG is Large Cap Growth Equities. XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while USSG tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XLG and 0.10% for USSG.

USSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 1.22), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLG and USSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer