PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLG vs. USSG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLG vs. USSG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLG achieves a 8.03% return, which is significantly lower than USSG's 10.71% return.


XLG

1D
0.42%
1M
4.19%
YTD
8.03%
6M
7.64%
1Y
28.88%
3Y*
24.70%
5Y*
16.34%
10Y*
17.28%

USSG

1D
1.10%
1M
5.20%
YTD
10.71%
6M
11.08%
1Y
29.11%
3Y*
22.87%
5Y*
14.04%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLG vs. USSG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
8.03%19.51%33.49%38.16%-24.29%30.77%24.15%20.62%
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
10.71%18.97%23.45%29.17%-20.33%31.83%18.71%19.24%

Correlation

The correlation between XLG and USSG is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.90

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.94

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2019

0.94

The correlation between XLG and USSG has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.90 to 0.94 - a consistent structural relationship.

XLG vs. USSG - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLG
USSG

Technology

43.9%
36.9%

Communication Services

17.1%
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

11.3%
8.6%

Financial Services

9.6%
10.6%

Healthcare

7.0%
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

5.8%
4.2%

Energy

2.7%
2.1%

Industrials

1.9%
8.1%

Basic Materials

0.6%
2.1%

Real Estate

-

2.2%

Utilities

-

1.1%

Technology

XLG
43.9%
USSG
36.9%

Communication Services

XLG
17.1%
USSG
14.5%

Consumer Cyclical

XLG
11.3%
USSG
8.6%

Financial Services

XLG
9.6%
USSG
10.6%

Healthcare

XLG
7.0%
USSG
9.6%

Consumer Defensive

XLG
5.8%
USSG
4.2%

Energy

XLG
2.7%
USSG
2.1%

Industrials

XLG
1.9%
USSG
8.1%

Basic Materials

XLG
0.6%
USSG
2.1%

Real Estate

XLG

-

USSG
2.2%

Utilities

XLG

-

USSG
1.1%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLG vs. USSG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLG
XLG Risk / Return Rank: 6060
Overall Rank
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6565
Omega Ratio Rank
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 4848
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

USSG
USSG Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
USSG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USSG Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
USSG Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
USSG Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
USSG Martin Ratio Rank: 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLG vs. USSG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLGUSSGDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.05

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.39

-0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.34

2.61

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.77

11.19

-2.42

XLG vs. USSG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.18, which is comparable to the USSG Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLG and USSG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLGUSSGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.18

2.22

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

0.80

+0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.92

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.63

0.85

-0.22

Drawdowns

XLG vs. USSG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than USSG's maximum drawdown of -34.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and USSG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLGUSSGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-52.39%

-34.10%

-18.29%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.41%

-11.20%

-1.21%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.70%

-20.00%

-0.70%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.02%

-27.00%

-1.02%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-30.46%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

-0.12%

-0.90%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.64%

-5.60%

-2.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.30%

2.61%

+0.69%

Volatility

XLG vs. USSG - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) is 3.19%, while Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF (USSG) has a volatility of 3.86%. This indicates that XLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USSG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLGUSSGDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.19%

3.86%

-0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

9.81%

10.09%

-0.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.32%

13.15%

+0.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.68%

17.59%

+1.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.84%

20.16%

-1.32%

XLG vs. USSG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is higher than USSG's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLG vs. USSG - Dividend Comparison

XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than USSG's 0.94% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
USSG
Xtrackers MSCI USA ESG Leaders Equity ETF
0.94%1.02%1.13%1.60%1.52%1.13%1.42%1.21%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLG
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF
0.60%0.64%0.72%0.97%1.34%0.94%1.25%1.58%2.00%1.85%2.00%2.09%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLG and USSG have a correlation of 0.90, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USSG has higher volatility (3.86%) compared to XLG (3.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLG dropped -52.39% vs USSG's -34.10%.

On 5-year performance, XLG leads with 16.34% vs 14.04% for USSG. On fees, USSG is cheaper at 0.10% per year. On volatility, XLG has been the lower-risk option at 3.19%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLG has performed better with a 16.34% return vs 14.04%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

USSG is cheaper with a 0.10% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for XLG.

USSG has the higher dividend yield at 0.94%, compared with 0.60% for XLG.

XLG is categorized as S&P 500, while USSG is Large Cap Growth Equities. XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while USSG tracks MSCI USA ESG Leaders. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Deutsche Bank. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XLG and 0.10% for USSG.

USSG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 2.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLG and USSG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer