XLG vs. SPHD
XLG (Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF) and SPHD (Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLG is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while SPHD is a Dividend fund tracking the S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLG returned 16.94%/yr vs 7.55%/yr for SPHD. A 0.55 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLG charges 0.20%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for SPHD.
Performance
XLG vs. SPHD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLG achieves a 1.60% return, which is significantly lower than SPHD's 8.20% return. Over the past 10 years, XLG has outperformed SPHD with an annualized return of 16.94%, while SPHD has yielded a comparatively lower 7.55% annualized return.
XLG
- 1D
- -1.88%
- 1M
- -5.41%
- YTD
- 1.60%
- 6M
- 0.73%
- 1Y
- 19.95%
- 3Y*
- 21.35%
- 5Y*
- 14.28%
- 10Y*
- 16.94%
SPHD
- 1D
- 1.63%
- 1M
- 0.82%
- YTD
- 8.20%
- 6M
- 8.56%
- 1Y
- 12.09%
- 3Y*
- 12.70%
- 5Y*
- 7.06%
- 10Y*
- 7.55%
XLG vs. SPHD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 1.60% | 19.51% | 33.49% | 38.16% | -24.29% | 30.77% | 24.15% | 32.04% | -3.59% | 23.04% |
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 8.20% | 3.41% | 18.08% | 1.32% | 0.58% | 24.98% | -9.98% | 20.26% | -6.17% | 11.90% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLG and SPHD is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.01 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 26, 2012 | 0.55 |
The correlation between XLG and SPHD shifts across timeframes, from -0.01 (1 year) to 0.55 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLG vs. SPHD — Risk / Return Rank
XLG
SPHD
XLG vs. SPHD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLG | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.37 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.26 | 1.18 | +0.08 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.61 | 1.66 | -0.04 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.77 | 4.06 | +1.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLG vs. SPHD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than SPHD's maximum drawdown of -41.39%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and SPHD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLG | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -52.39% | -41.39% | -11.00% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.41% | -7.33% | -5.08% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.70% | -13.29% | -7.41% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -28.02% | -19.50% | -8.52% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -30.46% | -41.39% | +10.93% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.91% | -1.91% | -5.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.63% | -4.69% | -2.94% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.46% | 2.98% | +0.48% |
Volatility
XLG vs. SPHD - Volatility Comparison
Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a higher volatility of 5.04% compared to Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF (SPHD) at 4.26%. This indicates that XLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPHD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLG | SPHD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.04% | 4.26% | +0.78% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 10.74% | 8.13% | +2.61% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.98% | 11.48% | +2.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.79% | 14.16% | +4.63% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.88% | 17.65% | +1.23% |
XLG vs. SPHD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLG has a 0.20% expense ratio, which is lower than SPHD's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLG vs. SPHD - Dividend Comparison
XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.66%, less than SPHD's 4.60% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPHD Invesco S&P 500® High Dividend Low Volatility ETF | 4.60% | 4.02% | 3.41% | 4.48% | 3.89% | 3.45% | 4.89% | 4.07% | 4.40% | 3.14% | 3.83% | 3.49% |
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF | 0.66% | 0.64% | 0.72% | 0.97% | 1.34% | 0.94% | 1.25% | 1.58% | 2.00% | 1.85% | 2.00% | 2.09% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLG and SPHD have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLG has higher volatility (5.04%) compared to SPHD (4.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLG dropped -52.39% vs SPHD's -41.39%.
On 10-year performance, XLG leads with 16.94% vs 7.55% for SPHD. On fees, XLG is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, SPHD has been the lower-risk option at 4.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLG has performed better with a 16.94% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLG is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for SPHD.
SPHD has the higher dividend yield at 4.60%, compared with 0.66% for XLG.
XLG is categorized as S&P 500, while SPHD is Dividend. XLG tracks S&P 500 Top 50 Index, while SPHD tracks S&P 500 Low Volatility High Dividend Index. Their fees differ too: 0.20% for XLG and 0.30% for SPHD.
XLG currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.44 vs 1.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLG and SPHD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer