XLG vs. EQAL

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL).

XLG and EQAL are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLG is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the S&P 500 Top 50 Index. It was launched on May 4, 2005. EQAL is a passively managed fund by Invesco that tracks the performance of the Russell 1000 Equal Weight Index. It was launched on Dec 23, 2014. Both XLG and EQAL are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XLG vs. EQAL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XLG vs. EQAL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	-7.18%	19.51%	33.49%	38.16%	-24.29%	30.77%	24.15%	32.04%	-3.59%	23.04%
EQAL Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF	5.48%	11.05%	11.38%	11.98%	-13.49%	23.14%	16.57%	24.54%	-9.22%	17.36%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLG achieves a -7.18% return, which is significantly lower than EQAL's 5.48% return. Over the past 10 years, XLG has outperformed EQAL with an annualized return of 15.72%, while EQAL has yielded a comparatively lower 10.39% annualized return.

XLG

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: -3.74%
• YTD: -7.18%
• 6M: -4.55%
• 1Y: 19.62%
• 3Y*: 21.92%
• 5Y*: 13.96%
• 10Y*: 15.72%

EQAL

• 1D: 0.31%
• 1M: -4.00%
• YTD: 5.48%
• 6M: 6.68%
• 1Y: 18.85%
• 3Y*: 12.43%
• 5Y*: 6.80%
• 10Y*: 10.39%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLG vs. EQAL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both XLG and EQAL have an expense ratio of 0.20%, making them cost-effective options compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios typically range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

XLG

Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF

EQAL

Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF

Return for Risk

XLG vs. EQAL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLG

XLG Risk / Return Rank: 57
XLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 53
XLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
XLG Omega Ratio Rank: 58
XLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
XLG Martin Ratio Rank: 56

EQAL

EQAL Risk / Return Rank: 57
EQAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 57
EQAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
EQAL Omega Ratio Rank: 58
EQAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 51
EQAL Martin Ratio Rank: 62

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLG vs. EQAL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) and Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	XLG	EQAL	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.99	1.05	-0.06
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.54	1.54	-0.01
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.22	1.23	0.00
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	1.63	1.41	+0.22
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	5.71	6.59	-0.88
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

XLG vs. EQAL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLG Sharpe Ratio is 0.99, which is comparable to the EQAL Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLG and EQAL, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLG	EQAL	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.99	1.05	-0.06
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.75	0.40	+0.36
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.84	0.55	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.59	0.48	+0.10

Correlation

The correlation between XLG and EQAL is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Dividends

XLG vs. EQAL - Dividend Comparison

XLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.70%, less than EQAL's 1.75% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
XLG Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF	0.70%	0.64%	0.72%	0.97%	1.34%	0.94%	1.25%	1.58%	2.00%	1.85%	2.00%	2.09%
EQAL Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF	1.75%	1.79%	1.62%	1.88%	1.95%	1.32%	1.63%	1.61%	1.62%	1.18%	1.57%	1.64%

Drawdowns

XLG vs. EQAL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLG drawdown since its inception was -52.39%, which is greater than EQAL's maximum drawdown of -40.44%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLG and EQAL.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLG	EQAL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-52.39%	-40.44%	-11.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.41%	-13.61%	+1.20%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-28.02%	-21.79%	-6.23%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-30.46%	-40.44%	+9.98%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.93%	-4.00%	-4.93%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.69%	-5.15%	-2.54%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	3.54%	2.91%	+0.63%

Volatility

XLG vs. EQAL - Volatility Comparison

Invesco S&P 500 Top 50 ETF (XLG) has a higher volatility of 5.82% compared to Invesco Russell 1000 Equal Weight ETF (EQAL) at 4.75%. This indicates that XLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EQAL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLG	EQAL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.82%	4.75%	+1.07%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.65%	9.52%	+1.13%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	19.97%	18.05%	+1.92%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	18.68%	17.29%	+1.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.81%	18.89%	-0.08%