PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLF vs. TRUF
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLF vs. TRUF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


XLF

1D
0.34%
1M
4.78%
6M
5.28%
YTD
4.51%
1Y
10.81%
3Y*
19.83%
5Y*
11.37%
10Y*
13.55%

TRUF

1D
0.28%
1M
4.66%
6M
YTD
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLF vs. TRUF - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLF and TRUF is 0.97 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 2, 2026

0.98

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLF vs. TRUF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLF
XLF Risk / Return Rank: 2222
Overall Rank
XLF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLF Sortino Ratio Rank: 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLF Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
XLF Calmar Ratio Rank: 2020
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLF Martin Ratio Rank: 2020
Martin Ratio Rank

TRUF

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLF vs. TRUF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLF) and VanEck Financials TruSector ETF (TRUF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLFTRUFDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.86

XLF vs. TRUF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLF vs. TRUF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, which is greater than TRUF's maximum drawdown of -3.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and TRUF.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLFTRUFDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-82.69%

-3.24%

-79.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.79%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-15.54%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.81%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-42.86%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-19.95%

-1.07%

-18.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

5.81%

Volatility

XLF vs. TRUF - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLFTRUFDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.13%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.24%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

14.64%

13.66%

+0.98%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.52%

13.66%

+4.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.06%

13.66%

+8.40%

XLF vs. TRUF - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLF has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than TRUF's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLF vs. TRUF - Dividend Comparison

XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, more than TRUF's 0.36% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TRUF
VanEck Financials TruSector ETF
0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLF
State Street Financial Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.42%1.31%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.87%2.08%1.48%21.10%1.95%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.97, XLF and TRUF move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

On fees, XLF is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLF is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for TRUF.

XLF has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.36% for TRUF.

They also come from different issuers: State Street and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLF and 0.10% for TRUF.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLF and TRUF

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer