XLF vs. GLDM
Compare and contrast key facts about Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM).
XLF and GLDM are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. GLDM is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the LBMA Gold PM Price. It was launched on Jun 25, 2018. Both XLF and GLDM are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
XLF vs. GLDM - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
XLF vs. GLDM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | -9.40% | 14.90% | 30.56% | 12.03% | -10.59% | 34.80% | -1.74% | 31.88% | -9.80% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 8.57% | 64.20% | 27.08% | 13.04% | -0.47% | -4.01% | 25.10% | 18.10% | 1.84% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLF achieves a -9.40% return, which is significantly lower than GLDM's 8.57% return.
XLF
- 1D
- 2.09%
- 1M
- -3.51%
- YTD
- -9.40%
- 6M
- -7.56%
- 1Y
- 0.65%
- 3Y*
- 17.25%
- 5Y*
- 9.34%
- 10Y*
- 12.44%
GLDM
- 1D
- 3.77%
- 1M
- -10.99%
- YTD
- 8.57%
- 6M
- 21.24%
- 1Y
- 49.77%
- 3Y*
- 33.33%
- 5Y*
- 21.91%
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
XLF vs. GLDM - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLF has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than GLDM's 0.10% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Return for Risk
XLF vs. GLDM — Risk / Return Rank
XLF
GLDM
XLF vs. GLDM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) and SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLF | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.03 | 1.82 | -1.78 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.18 | 2.25 | -2.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.33 | -0.31 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.13 | 2.71 | -2.58 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.38 | 10.04 | -9.66 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLF | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.03 | 1.82 | -1.78 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.50 | 1.25 | -0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.56 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.20 | 1.09 | -0.89 |
Correlation
The correlation between XLF and GLDM is -0.01. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.
Dividends
XLF vs. GLDM - Dividend Comparison
XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.60%, while GLDM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.60% | 1.31% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.87% | 2.08% | 1.48% | 21.10% | 1.95% |
GLDM SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
XLF vs. GLDM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLF drawdown since its inception was -82.69%, which is greater than GLDM's maximum drawdown of -21.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLF and GLDM.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLF | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -82.69% | -21.63% | -61.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.79% | -19.14% | +4.35% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.81% | -20.92% | -4.89% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -42.86% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.01% | -13.19% | +1.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -20.10% | -6.04% | -14.06% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.90% | 5.16% | -0.26% |
Volatility
XLF vs. GLDM - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) is 4.75%, while SPDR Gold MiniShares Trust (GLDM) has a volatility of 11.01%. This indicates that XLF experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLDM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| XLF | GLDM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.75% | 11.01% | -6.26% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.45% | 24.07% | -12.62% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.29% | 27.57% | -8.28% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.69% | 17.65% | +1.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.19% | 16.77% | +5.42% |