XLEI vs. LITP

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI) and Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP).

XLEI and LITP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. XLEI is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the S&P Energy Select Sector. It was launched on Jul 29, 2025. LITP is a passively managed fund by Sprott that tracks the performance of the Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Feb 1, 2023. Both XLEI and LITP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.

Performance

XLEI vs. LITP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI) and Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

XLEI vs. LITP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
XLEI State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	20.48%	6.77%
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF	10.13%	94.06%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLEI achieves a 20.48% return, which is significantly higher than LITP's 10.13% return.

XLEI

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: 7.60%
• YTD: 20.48%
• 6M: 24.96%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

LITP

• 1D: 2.47%
• 1M: -5.35%
• YTD: 10.13%
• 6M: 58.57%
• 1Y: 140.65%
• 3Y*: -2.71%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLEI vs. LITP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLEI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LITP's 0.65% expense ratio.

LITP

Sprott Lithium Miners ETF

XLEI

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF

Return for Risk

XLEI vs. LITP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

LITP

LITP Risk / Return Rank: 92
LITP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 95
LITP Sortino Ratio Rank: 93
LITP Omega Ratio Rank: 86
LITP Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
LITP Martin Ratio Rank: 92

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLEI vs. LITP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI) and Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	XLEI	LITP	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.42	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	4.03	-0.17	+4.20

Correlation

The correlation between XLEI and LITP is 0.11, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

XLEI vs. LITP - Dividend Comparison

XLEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.17%, more than LITP's 6.73% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023
XLEI State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	11.17%	10.17%	0.00%	0.00%
LITP Sprott Lithium Miners ETF	6.73%	7.41%	6.55%	2.80%

Drawdowns

XLEI vs. LITP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLEI drawdown since its inception was -5.31%, smaller than the maximum LITP drawdown of -74.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLEI and LITP.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLEI	LITP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-5.31%	-74.72%	+69.41%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-31.12%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.92%	-23.14%	+22.22%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.93%	-44.08%	+43.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	10.37%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XLEI	LITP	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	18.81%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	44.10%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.43%	58.79%	-47.36%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.43%	47.29%	-35.86%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.43%	47.29%	-35.86%