PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLEI vs. LITP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLEI vs. LITP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI) and Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLEI achieves a 20.42% return, which is significantly lower than LITP's 28.96% return.


XLEI

1D
1.05%
1M
1.40%
YTD
20.42%
6M
20.06%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

LITP

1D
-4.66%
1M
-7.17%
YTD
28.96%
6M
41.58%
1Y
218.79%
3Y*
-0.12%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLEI vs. LITP - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLEI and LITP is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025

0.04

XLEI vs. LITP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLEI
LITP

Financial Services

100.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

100.0%

Communication Services

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Technology

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Financial Services

XLEI
100.3%
LITP

-

Basic Materials

XLEI

-

LITP
100.0%

Communication Services

XLEI

-

LITP

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLEI

-

LITP

-

Consumer Defensive

XLEI

-

LITP

-

Energy

XLEI

-

LITP

-

Healthcare

XLEI

-

LITP

-

Industrials

XLEI

-

LITP

-

Real Estate

XLEI

-

LITP

-

Technology

XLEI

-

LITP

-

Utilities

XLEI

-

LITP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLEI vs. LITP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLEI

LITP
LITP Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
LITP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LITP Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LITP Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
LITP Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
LITP Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLEI vs. LITP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLEI) and Sprott Lithium Miners ETF (LITP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

XLEI vs. LITP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLEILITPDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.78

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.65

-0.07

+2.72

Drawdowns

XLEI vs. LITP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLEI drawdown since its inception was -7.98%, smaller than the maximum LITP drawdown of -74.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLEI and LITP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLEILITPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-7.98%

-74.72%

+66.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-31.12%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.31%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.97%

-14.47%

+13.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.52%

-42.29%

+40.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.23%

Volatility

XLEI vs. LITP - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLEILITPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

39.69%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.16%

58.34%

-45.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

13.16%

47.34%

-34.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

13.16%

47.34%

-34.18%

XLEI vs. LITP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLEI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than LITP's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLEI vs. LITP - Dividend Comparison

XLEI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 16.59%, more than LITP's 5.74% yield.


PositionTTM202520242023
LITP
Sprott Lithium Miners ETF
5.74%7.41%6.55%2.80%
XLEI
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
16.59%10.17%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLEI and LITP have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLEI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLEI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for LITP.

XLEI has the higher dividend yield at 16.59%, compared with 5.74% for LITP.

XLEI tracks S&P Energy Select Sector, while LITP tracks Nasdaq Sprott Lithium Miners Index - Benchmark TR Gross. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Sprott. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLEI and 0.65% for LITP.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLEI and LITP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer