XLE vs. XTL
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and XTL (SPDR S&P Telecom ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while XTL is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Telecom Select Industry Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 9.49%/yr vs 16.10%/yr for XTL. At a 0.43 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for XTL.
Performance
XLE vs. XTL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 25.06% return, which is significantly lower than XTL's 51.46% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed XTL with an annualized return of 9.49%, while XTL has yielded a comparatively higher 16.10% annualized return.
XLE
- 1D
- -3.48%
- 1M
- -6.54%
- YTD
- 25.06%
- 6M
- 24.78%
- 1Y
- 30.16%
- 3Y*
- 14.85%
- 5Y*
- 19.05%
- 10Y*
- 9.49%
XTL
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 2.37%
- YTD
- 51.46%
- 6M
- 55.42%
- 1Y
- 120.69%
- 3Y*
- 45.66%
- 5Y*
- 19.06%
- 10Y*
- 16.10%
XLE vs. XTL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 25.06% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 51.46% | 44.95% | 34.89% | -1.17% | -19.18% | 21.58% | 22.46% | 12.51% | -6.60% | 0.56% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and XTL is 0.04, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.04 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.22 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.30 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 27, 2011 | 0.43 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLE and XTL has dropped to 0.04 - well below their long-term average of 0.43, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLE vs. XTL - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLE
XTL
Energy
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Energy
XLE
XTL
-
Basic Materials
XLE
-
XTL
-
Communication Services
XLE
-
XTL
Consumer Cyclical
XLE
-
XTL
-
Consumer Defensive
XLE
-
XTL
-
Financial Services
XLE
-
XTL
-
Healthcare
XLE
-
XTL
-
Industrials
XLE
-
XTL
-
Real Estate
XLE
-
XTL
Technology
XLE
-
XTL
Utilities
XLE
-
XTL
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. XTL — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
XTL
XLE vs. XTL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLE | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.58 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.51 | 8.26 | -5.74 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.91 | 34.62 | -27.71 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLE vs. XTL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than XTL's maximum drawdown of -37.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and XTL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -37.01% | -34.25% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -14.70% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -22.79% | +2.65% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -37.01% | +10.97% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | -37.01% | -29.80% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -11.21% | -6.61% | -4.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -9.76% | -8.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.38% | 3.50% | +0.88% |
Volatility
XLE vs. XTL - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) is 8.02%, while SPDR S&P Telecom ETF (XTL) has a volatility of 11.24%. This indicates that XLE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XTL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | XTL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.02% | 11.24% | -3.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.19% | 24.21% | -7.02% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.86% | 30.10% | -9.24% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.10% | 25.35% | +0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.61% | 23.67% | +5.94% |
XLE vs. XTL - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than XTL's 0.35% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLE vs. XTL - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.69%, more than XTL's 0.86% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.69% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
XTL SPDR S&P Telecom ETF | 0.86% | 1.05% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.74% | 1.25% | 0.88% | 0.92% | 1.90% | 2.08% | 1.11% | 1.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and XTL have a correlation of 0.04, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XTL has higher volatility (11.24%) compared to XLE (8.02%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs XTL's -37.01%.
On 10-year performance, XTL leads with 16.10% vs 9.49% for XLE. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLE has been the lower-risk option at 8.02%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XTL has performed better with a 16.10% return vs 9.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XTL.
XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.69%, compared with 0.86% for XTL.
XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while XTL is Communications Equities. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while XTL tracks S&P Telecom Select Industry Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.35% for XTL.
XTL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (4.04 vs 1.46), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and XTL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer