XLE vs. VONG

Last updated Jun 14, 2026

XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and VONG (Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while VONG is a Large Cap Growth Equities fund tracking the Russell 1000 Growth Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 9.91%/yr vs 18.29%/yr for VONG. At a 0.42 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.06%/yr for VONG.

Performance

XLE vs. VONG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 29.56% return, which is significantly higher than VONG's 2.96% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed VONG with an annualized return of 9.91%, while VONG has yielded a comparatively higher 18.29% annualized return.

XLE

• 1D: 0.75%
• 1M: -0.90%
• YTD: 29.56%
• 6M: 28.37%
• 1Y: 34.84%
• 3Y*: 16.18%
• 5Y*: 20.12%
• 10Y*: 9.91%

VONG

• 1D: 0.10%
• 1M: -3.37%
• YTD: 2.96%
• 6M: 3.46%
• 1Y: 20.50%
• 3Y*: 22.47%
• 5Y*: 14.01%
• 10Y*: 18.29%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLE vs. VONG - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	29.56%	7.88%	5.56%	-0.63%	64.32%	53.28%	-32.67%	11.74%	-18.22%	-0.89%
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	2.96%	18.45%	33.20%	42.67%	-29.18%	27.60%	38.30%	36.06%	-1.53%	30.05%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and VONG is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.21
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.03
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.17
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.28
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 22, 2010	0.42

The correlation between XLE and VONG shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.42 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLE vs. VONG - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLE	VONG
Energy	100.0%	0.4%
Basic Materials	-	0.3%
Communication Services	-	13.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	13.2%
Consumer Defensive	-	2.7%
Financial Services	-	5.3%
Healthcare	-	7.1%
Industrials	-	5.7%
Real Estate	-	0.4%
Technology	-	51.4%
Utilities	-	0.3%

Return for Risk

XLE vs. VONG — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLE

XLE Risk / Return Rank: 61
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 64
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 58
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 54
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 71
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 56

VONG

VONG Risk / Return Rank: 34
VONG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 38
VONG Sortino Ratio Rank: 36
VONG Omega Ratio Rank: 37
VONG Calmar Ratio Rank: 27
VONG Martin Ratio Rank: 30

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLE vs. VONG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLE	VONG	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.82	1.20	+0.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	1.67	+0.73
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.30	1.21	+0.08
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.10	1.17	+1.93
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	8.63	3.87	+4.76

XLE vs. VONG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 1.82, which is higher than the VONG Sharpe Ratio of 1.20. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and VONG, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

XLE vs. VONG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than VONG's maximum drawdown of -32.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and VONG.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLE	VONG	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.26%	-32.72%	-38.54%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-12.05%	-16.23%	+4.18%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.14%	-23.27%	+3.13%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.04%	-32.72%	+6.68%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.81%	-32.72%	-34.09%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.01%	-5.52%	-2.49%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.97%	-4.88%	-13.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.32%	4.91%	-0.59%

Volatility

XLE vs. VONG - Volatility Comparison

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF (VONG) at 5.30%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VONG based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	XLE	VONG	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.26%	5.30%	+1.96%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.79%	12.35%	+4.44%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.57%	15.87%	+4.70%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.05%	21.39%	+4.66%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.58%	20.91%	+8.67%

XLE vs. VONG - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VONG's 0.06% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLE vs. VONG - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, more than VONG's 0.44% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
VONG Vanguard Russell 1000 Growth ETF	0.44%	0.45%	0.55%	0.71%	0.98%	0.58%	0.77%	1.03%	1.18%	1.19%	1.48%	1.47%
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.59%	3.28%	3.36%	3.55%	3.68%	4.21%	5.62%	6.72%	3.54%	3.03%	2.26%	3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLE and VONG in my portfolio?

XLE and VONG have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, XLE or VONG?

XLE has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to VONG (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs VONG's -32.72%.

Which ETF is better, XLE or VONG?

On 10-year performance, VONG leads with 18.29% vs 9.91% for XLE. On fees, VONG is cheaper at 0.06% per year. On volatility, VONG has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, XLE or VONG?

Over the 10-year period, VONG has performed better with a 18.29% return vs 9.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLE or VONG?

VONG is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLE or VONG?

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.59%, compared with 0.44% for VONG.

What is the main difference between XLE and VONG?

XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while VONG is Large Cap Growth Equities. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while VONG tracks Russell 1000 Growth Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.06% for VONG.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.20), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.