PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLE vs. SPYM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLE vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 32.26% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 11.36% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed SPYM with an annualized return of 9.99%, while SPYM has yielded a comparatively higher 15.57% annualized return.


XLE

1D
0.07%
1M
-1.18%
YTD
32.26%
6M
29.34%
1Y
47.98%
3Y*
17.74%
5Y*
20.45%
10Y*
9.99%

SPYM

1D
0.34%
1M
4.60%
YTD
11.36%
6M
11.25%
1Y
28.60%
3Y*
22.67%
5Y*
13.99%
10Y*
15.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLE vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
32.26%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
11.36%17.79%25.00%26.24%-18.09%28.78%18.49%31.99%-4.78%21.30%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and SPYM is -0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.17

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.31

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.44

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 16, 2005

0.51

The correlation between XLE and SPYM shifts across timeframes, from -0.09 (1 year) to 0.51 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XLE vs. SPYM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLE
SPYM

Energy

100.0%
3.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.7%

Communication Services

-

10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

4.6%

Financial Services

-

11.1%

Healthcare

-

8.4%

Industrials

-

7.6%

Real Estate

-

1.8%

Technology

-

38.5%

Utilities

-

2.5%

Energy

XLE
100.0%
SPYM
3.2%

Basic Materials

XLE

-

SPYM
1.7%

Communication Services

XLE

-

SPYM
10.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XLE

-

SPYM
9.9%

Consumer Defensive

XLE

-

SPYM
4.6%

Financial Services

XLE

-

SPYM
11.1%

Healthcare

XLE

-

SPYM
8.4%

Industrials

XLE

-

SPYM
7.6%

Real Estate

XLE

-

SPYM
1.8%

Technology

XLE

-

SPYM
38.5%

Utilities

XLE

-

SPYM
2.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLE vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 7070
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7979
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SPYM
SPYM Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
SPYM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SPYM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SPYM Omega Ratio Rank: 7575
Omega Ratio Rank
SPYM Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
SPYM Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLE vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLESPYMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.07

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.38

1.44

-0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.00

3.23

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.60

15.02

-3.43

XLE vs. SPYM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 2.36, which is comparable to the SPYM Sharpe Ratio of 2.44. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and SPYM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLESPYMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.36

2.44

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.79

0.84

-0.05

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

0.87

-0.53

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.31

0.62

-0.31

Drawdowns

XLE vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and SPYM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLESPYMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.26%

-54.46%

-16.80%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

-8.90%

-3.15%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

-18.72%

-1.42%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-24.48%

-1.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

-33.87%

-32.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.09%

-0.32%

-5.77%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.98%

-7.15%

-10.83%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.15%

1.91%

+2.24%

Volatility

XLE vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 8.25% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 2.78%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLESPYMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.25%

2.78%

+5.47%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.51%

8.91%

+7.60%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.50%

11.79%

+8.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.01%

16.80%

+9.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.58%

18.00%

+11.58%

XLE vs. SPYM - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SPYM's 0.02% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLE vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.54%, more than SPYM's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SPYM
State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF
0.99%1.13%1.28%1.44%1.69%1.25%1.54%1.79%2.23%1.75%1.97%1.98%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.54%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLE and SPYM have a correlation of -0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (8.25%) compared to SPYM (2.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs SPYM's -54.46%.

On 10-year performance, SPYM leads with 15.57% vs 9.99% for XLE. On fees, SPYM is cheaper at 0.02% per year. On volatility, SPYM has been the lower-risk option at 2.78%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SPYM has performed better with a 15.57% return vs 9.99%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SPYM is cheaper with a 0.02% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLE.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.54%, compared with 0.99% for SPYM.

XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while SPYM is S&P 500. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while SPYM tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.02% for SPYM.

SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.44 vs 2.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLE and SPYM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer