PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLE vs. SCHA
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLE vs. SCHA - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 28.59% return, which is significantly higher than SCHA's 21.09% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has underperformed SCHA with an annualized return of 9.82%, while SCHA has yielded a comparatively higher 11.39% annualized return.


XLE

1D
-1.94%
1M
-0.78%
YTD
28.59%
6M
26.16%
1Y
36.64%
3Y*
16.07%
5Y*
19.94%
10Y*
9.82%

SCHA

1D
3.42%
1M
4.11%
YTD
21.09%
6M
16.82%
1Y
39.46%
3Y*
18.41%
5Y*
6.95%
10Y*
11.39%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLE vs. SCHA - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
28.59%7.88%5.56%-0.63%64.32%53.28%-32.67%11.74%-18.22%-0.89%
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
21.09%11.60%11.16%18.46%-19.81%16.45%19.34%26.50%-11.79%14.94%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and SCHA is 0.03, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.41

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 3, 2009

0.61

Over the past year, the correlation between XLE and SCHA has dropped to 0.03 - well below their long-term average of 0.60, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLE vs. SCHA - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLE
SCHA

Energy

100.0%
5.4%

Basic Materials

-

4.4%

Communication Services

-

2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

-

9.0%

Consumer Defensive

-

2.5%

Financial Services

-

15.3%

Healthcare

-

13.2%

Industrials

-

15.6%

Real Estate

-

5.9%

Technology

-

23.9%

Utilities

-

2.3%

Energy

XLE
100.0%
SCHA
5.4%

Basic Materials

XLE

-

SCHA
4.4%

Communication Services

XLE

-

SCHA
2.3%

Consumer Cyclical

XLE

-

SCHA
9.0%

Consumer Defensive

XLE

-

SCHA
2.5%

Financial Services

XLE

-

SCHA
15.3%

Healthcare

XLE

-

SCHA
13.2%

Industrials

XLE

-

SCHA
15.6%

Real Estate

XLE

-

SCHA
5.9%

Technology

XLE

-

SCHA
23.9%

Utilities

XLE

-

SCHA
2.3%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLE vs. SCHA — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLE
XLE Risk / Return Rank: 6363
Overall Rank
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6767
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 5757
Omega Ratio Rank
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 5959
Martin Ratio Rank

SCHA
SCHA Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
SCHA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SCHA Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
SCHA Omega Ratio Rank: 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
SCHA Calmar Ratio Rank: 8787
Calmar Ratio Rank
SCHA Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLE vs. SCHA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLESCHADifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.34

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.61

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.29

1.36

-0.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.05

4.17

-1.12

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

8.57

15.27

-6.71

XLE vs. SCHA - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLE Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the SCHA Sharpe Ratio of 2.13. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLE and SCHA, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLE vs. SCHA - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than SCHA's maximum drawdown of -42.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and SCHA.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLESCHADifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.26%

-42.41%

-28.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-12.05%

-9.50%

-2.55%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-20.14%

-27.29%

+7.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-26.04%

-30.79%

+4.75%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.81%

-42.41%

-24.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-8.70%

0.00%

-8.70%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-17.97%

-7.57%

-10.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.29%

2.59%

+1.70%

Volatility

XLE vs. SCHA - Volatility Comparison

State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 7.22% compared to Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF (SCHA) at 6.55%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SCHA based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLESCHADifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.22%

6.55%

+0.67%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.80%

13.72%

+3.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.60%

18.60%

+2.00%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.06%

22.03%

+4.03%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.58%

22.75%

+6.83%

XLE vs. SCHA - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHA's 0.04% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLE vs. SCHA - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.61%, more than SCHA's 0.99% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
SCHA
Schwab U.S. Small-Cap ETF
0.99%1.26%1.51%1.42%1.37%1.19%1.05%1.39%1.58%1.24%1.50%1.48%
XLE
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.61%3.28%3.36%3.55%3.68%4.21%5.62%6.72%3.54%3.03%2.26%3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLE and SCHA have a correlation of 0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLE has higher volatility (7.22%) compared to SCHA (6.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs SCHA's -42.41%.

On 10-year performance, SCHA leads with 11.39% vs 9.82% for XLE. On fees, SCHA is cheaper at 0.04% per year. On volatility, SCHA has been the lower-risk option at 6.55%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, SCHA has performed better with a 11.39% return vs 9.82%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

SCHA is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.08% for XLE.

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 0.99% for SCHA.

XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while SCHA is Small Cap Blend Equities. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while SCHA tracks Dow Jones U.S. Small-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.04% for SCHA.

SCHA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.79), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLE and SCHA

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer