XLE vs. FCFAX
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and FCFAX (Frost Credit Fund) are both funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while FCFAX is a Short-Term Bond fund managed by Frost Funds. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 9.91%/yr vs 5.17%/yr for FCFAX. At a 0.01 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.96%/yr for FCFAX.
Performance
XLE vs. FCFAX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 29.56% return, which is significantly higher than FCFAX's 1.58% return. Over the past 10 years, XLE has outperformed FCFAX with an annualized return of 9.91%, while FCFAX has yielded a comparatively lower 5.17% annualized return.
XLE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.14%
- YTD
- 29.56%
- 6M
- 28.37%
- 1Y
- 37.19%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
FCFAX
- 1D
- 0.33%
- 1M
- 0.72%
- YTD
- 1.58%
- 6M
- 1.88%
- 1Y
- 4.56%
- 3Y*
- 7.23%
- 5Y*
- 3.79%
- 10Y*
- 5.17%
XLE vs. FCFAX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.56% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund | 1.58% | 5.21% | 8.01% | 11.23% | -7.83% | 5.07% | 6.22% | 6.95% | 0.89% | 7.95% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and FCFAX is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.00 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 2, 2013 | 0.01 |
The correlation between XLE and FCFAX shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to 0.01 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. FCFAX — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
FCFAX
XLE vs. FCFAX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLE | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.32 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.86 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.43 | -0.13 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 2.65 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 9.89 | -1.25 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLE vs. FCFAX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than FCFAX's maximum drawdown of -16.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and FCFAX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -16.33% | -54.93% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -1.82% | -10.23% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -2.82% | -17.32% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -10.49% | -15.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | -16.33% | -50.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | 0.00% | -8.01% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -1.53% | -16.44% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 0.49% | +3.83% |
Volatility
XLE vs. FCFAX - Volatility Comparison
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to Frost Credit Fund (FCFAX) at 0.77%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FCFAX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | FCFAX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 0.77% | +6.49% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.79% | 1.76% | +15.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.57% | 2.27% | +18.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.05% | 2.77% | +23.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 3.24% | +26.34% |
XLE vs. FCFAX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than FCFAX's 0.96% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLE vs. FCFAX - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than FCFAX's 6.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FCFAX Frost Credit Fund | 6.15% | 6.10% | 5.76% | 5.93% | 5.00% | 3.65% | 3.69% | 4.62% | 5.05% | 5.85% | 4.84% | 4.95% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.59% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and FCFAX have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to FCFAX (0.77%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs FCFAX's -16.33%.
FCFAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.82), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and FCFAX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer