XLE vs. EWJ
XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and EWJ (iShares MSCI Japan ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLE is a Energy Equities fund tracking the Energy Select Sector Index, while EWJ is a Japan Equities fund tracking the MSCI Japan Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLE returned 9.91%/yr vs 9.55%/yr for EWJ. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.49%/yr for EWJ.
Performance
XLE vs. EWJ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLE achieves a 29.56% return, which is significantly higher than EWJ's 14.83% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with XLE having a 9.91% annualized return and EWJ not far behind at 9.55%.
XLE
- 1D
- 0.75%
- 1M
- -0.90%
- YTD
- 29.56%
- 6M
- 28.37%
- 1Y
- 34.84%
- 3Y*
- 16.18%
- 5Y*
- 20.12%
- 10Y*
- 9.91%
EWJ
- 1D
- 0.57%
- 1M
- 0.71%
- YTD
- 14.83%
- 6M
- 14.50%
- 1Y
- 31.74%
- 3Y*
- 16.57%
- 5Y*
- 8.56%
- 10Y*
- 9.55%
XLE vs. EWJ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 29.56% | 7.88% | 5.56% | -0.63% | 64.32% | 53.28% | -32.67% | 11.74% | -18.22% | -0.89% |
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 14.83% | 25.84% | 7.03% | 20.29% | -17.72% | 1.16% | 15.40% | 19.34% | -14.10% | 24.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLE and EWJ is -0.02, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.15 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.25 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.36 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 22, 1998 | 0.39 |
The correlation between XLE and EWJ shifts across timeframes, from -0.02 (1 year) to 0.39 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLE vs. EWJ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLE
EWJ
Energy
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Energy
XLE
EWJ
Basic Materials
XLE
-
EWJ
Communication Services
XLE
-
EWJ
Consumer Cyclical
XLE
-
EWJ
Consumer Defensive
XLE
-
EWJ
Financial Services
XLE
-
EWJ
Healthcare
XLE
-
EWJ
Industrials
XLE
-
EWJ
Real Estate
XLE
-
EWJ
Technology
XLE
-
EWJ
Utilities
XLE
-
EWJ
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLE vs. EWJ — Risk / Return Rank
XLE
EWJ
XLE vs. EWJ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLE | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.29 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.19 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.28 | +0.01 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.10 | 2.27 | +0.83 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.63 | 7.62 | +1.01 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLE vs. EWJ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than EWJ's maximum drawdown of -60.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and EWJ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLE | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -71.26% | -60.93% | -10.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.05% | -13.59% | +1.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.14% | -14.68% | -5.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.04% | -33.14% | +7.10% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -66.81% | -33.14% | -33.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -8.01% | -1.51% | -6.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.97% | -21.72% | +3.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.32% | 4.04% | +0.28% |
Volatility
XLE vs. EWJ - Volatility Comparison
State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) has a higher volatility of 7.26% compared to iShares MSCI Japan ETF (EWJ) at 6.31%. This indicates that XLE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than EWJ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLE | EWJ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 7.26% | 6.31% | +0.95% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.79% | 15.96% | +0.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.57% | 20.23% | +0.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 26.05% | 18.38% | +7.67% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.58% | 17.33% | +12.25% |
XLE vs. EWJ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than EWJ's 0.49% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLE vs. EWJ - Dividend Comparison
XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.59%, less than EWJ's 3.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
EWJ iShares MSCI Japan ETF | 3.94% | 4.52% | 2.34% | 2.03% | 1.23% | 2.08% | 1.04% | 2.03% | 1.71% | 1.25% | 1.95% | 1.27% |
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF | 2.59% | 3.28% | 3.36% | 3.55% | 3.68% | 4.21% | 5.62% | 6.72% | 3.54% | 3.03% | 2.26% | 3.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLE and EWJ have a correlation of -0.02, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLE has higher volatility (7.26%) compared to EWJ (6.31%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLE dropped -71.26% vs EWJ's -60.93%.
On 10-year performance, XLE leads with 9.91% vs 9.55% for EWJ. On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, EWJ has been the lower-risk option at 6.31%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XLE has performed better with a 9.91% return vs 9.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.49% for EWJ.
EWJ has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 2.59% for XLE.
XLE is categorized as Energy Equities, while EWJ is Japan Equities. XLE tracks Energy Select Sector Index, while EWJ tracks MSCI Japan Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.49% for EWJ.
XLE currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.82 vs 1.52), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLE and EWJ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer