XLE vs. BPH

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

XLE (State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF) and BPH (BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF) are both Energy Equities funds. XLE is passively managed, while BPH is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLE charges 0.08%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for BPH.

Performance

XLE vs. BPH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XLE

• 1D: -1.63%
• 1M: -9.30%
• YTD: 21.47%
• 6M: 22.40%
• 1Y: 30.11%
• 3Y*: 15.10%
• 5Y*: 18.36%
• 10Y*: 9.19%

BPH

• 1D: -3.60%
• 1M: -8.93%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLE vs. BPH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	-9.30%
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	-8.93%

Correlation

The correlation between XLE and BPH is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 26, 2026	0.80

XLE vs. BPH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLE	BPH
Energy	100.0%	100.0%
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Financial Services	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Industrials	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLE vs. BPH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLE

XLE Risk / Return Rank: 44
XLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
XLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 42
XLE Omega Ratio Rank: 40
XLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
XLE Martin Ratio Rank: 43

BPH

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLE vs. BPH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLE) and BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF (BPH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	XLE	BPH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.46	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	1.98	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.24	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.15	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.33	—	—

Drawdowns

XLE vs. BPH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLE drawdown since its inception was -71.26%, which is greater than BPH's maximum drawdown of -12.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLE and BPH.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLE	BPH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-71.26%	-12.01%	-59.25%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-14.05%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-20.14%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-26.04%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-66.81%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-13.75%	-12.01%	-1.74%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-17.96%	-3.60%	-14.36%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	4.77%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XLE	BPH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.16%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.92%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.83%	26.17%	-5.34%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	25.99%	26.17%	-0.18%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.60%	26.17%	+3.43%

XLE vs. BPH - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLE has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than BPH's 0.19% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.

Dividends

XLE vs. BPH - Dividend Comparison

XLE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.83%, more than BPH's 0.55% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
BPH BP p.l.c. ADRhedged ETF	0.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
XLE State Street Energy Select Sector SPDR ETF	2.83%	3.28%	3.36%	3.55%	3.68%	4.21%	5.62%	6.72%	3.54%	3.03%	2.26%	3.39%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both XLE and BPH in my portfolio?

XLE and BPH have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, XLE or BPH?

On fees, XLE is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLE or BPH?

XLE is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.19% for BPH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLE or BPH?

XLE has the higher dividend yield at 2.83%, compared with 0.55% for BPH.

What is the main difference between XLE and BPH?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.08% for XLE and 0.19% for BPH.