XLCI vs. QYLD
XLCI (State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and QYLD (Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLCI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while QYLD is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the CBOE NASDAQ-100 Buy Write V2. XLCI is actively managed, while QYLD is passively managed. A 0.58 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLCI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for QYLD.
Performance
XLCI vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLCI achieves a -1.17% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 5.92% return.
XLCI
- 1D
- -1.18%
- 1M
- -3.83%
- YTD
- -1.17%
- 6M
- 0.82%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QYLD
- 1D
- -1.82%
- 1M
- -0.67%
- YTD
- 5.92%
- 6M
- 7.78%
- 1Y
- 21.82%
- 3Y*
- 13.07%
- 5Y*
- 8.04%
- 10Y*
- 9.61%
XLCI vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLCI State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | -1.17% | 6.80% |
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 5.92% | 10.72% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLCI and QYLD is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 31, 2025 | 0.58 |
XLCI vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLCI
QYLD
Financial Services
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Financial Services
XLCI
QYLD
Basic Materials
XLCI
-
QYLD
Communication Services
XLCI
-
QYLD
Consumer Cyclical
XLCI
-
QYLD
Consumer Defensive
XLCI
-
QYLD
Energy
XLCI
-
QYLD
Healthcare
XLCI
-
QYLD
Industrials
XLCI
-
QYLD
Real Estate
XLCI
-
QYLD
Technology
XLCI
-
QYLD
Utilities
XLCI
-
QYLD
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLCI vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank
XLCI
QYLD
XLCI vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLCI | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.50 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.62 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.61 | 0.58 | +0.03 |
Drawdowns
XLCI vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLCI drawdown since its inception was -7.72%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLCI and QYLD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLCI | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.72% | -24.75% | +17.03% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -4.97% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -19.06% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -24.61% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -24.75% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.18% | -1.87% | -2.31% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.53% | -3.84% | +2.31% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.85% | — |
Volatility
XLCI vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLCI | QYLD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.64% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.37% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.88% | 8.78% | +2.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 10.88% | 14.71% | -3.83% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 10.88% | 15.50% | -4.62% |
XLCI vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLCI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLCI vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison
XLCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.08%, less than QYLD's 11.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
QYLD Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF | 11.67% | 11.55% | 12.50% | 11.78% | 13.75% | 12.85% | 11.16% | 9.84% | 12.44% | 7.69% | 9.15% | 9.42% |
XLCI State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 10.08% | 5.23% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLCI and QYLD have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLCI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLCI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.
QYLD has the higher dividend yield at 11.67%, compared with 10.08% for XLCI.
XLCI is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLCI and 0.60% for QYLD.
Find the right allocation for XLCI and QYLD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer