PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLCI vs. QYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLCI vs. QYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLCI achieves a -2.03% return, which is significantly lower than QYLD's 8.73% return.


XLCI

1D
-0.06%
1M
-2.40%
6M
-2.03%
YTD
-2.03%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

QYLD

1D
-1.17%
1M
0.73%
6M
8.73%
YTD
8.73%
1Y
22.03%
3Y*
13.65%
5Y*
8.27%
10Y*
9.86%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLCI vs. QYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between XLCI and QYLD is 0.51, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025

0.51

XLCI vs. QYLD - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLCI
QYLD

Communication Services

100.0%
14.3%

Financial Services

99.2%
0.2%

Basic Materials

-

1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

-

11.4%

Consumer Defensive

-

6.4%

Energy

-

0.5%

Healthcare

-

3.7%

Industrials

-

2.6%

Real Estate

-

0.1%

Technology

-

58.7%

Utilities

-

1.2%

Communication Services

XLCI
100.0%
QYLD
14.3%

Financial Services

XLCI
99.2%
QYLD
0.2%

Basic Materials

XLCI

-

QYLD
1.0%

Consumer Cyclical

XLCI

-

QYLD
11.4%

Consumer Defensive

XLCI

-

QYLD
6.4%

Energy

XLCI

-

QYLD
0.5%

Healthcare

XLCI

-

QYLD
3.7%

Industrials

XLCI

-

QYLD
2.6%

Real Estate

XLCI

-

QYLD
0.1%

Technology

XLCI

-

QYLD
58.7%

Utilities

XLCI

-

QYLD
1.2%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLCI vs. QYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLCI

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


QYLD
QYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
QYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8282
Sortino Ratio Rank
QYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 8989
Omega Ratio Rank
QYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 8989
Calmar Ratio Rank
QYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLCI vs. QYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF (QYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLCIQYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.48

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

4.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

23.68

XLCI vs. QYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLCI vs. QYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLCI drawdown since its inception was -8.44%, smaller than the maximum QYLD drawdown of -24.75%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLCI and QYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLCIQYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-8.44%

-24.75%

+16.31%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.06%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.61%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.75%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-5.01%

-1.84%

-3.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-1.84%

-3.82%

+1.98%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.93%

Volatility

XLCI vs. QYLD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLCIQYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.58%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

8.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

11.48%

10.10%

+1.38%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

11.48%

14.90%

-3.42%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

11.48%

15.55%

-4.07%

XLCI vs. QYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLCI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than QYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

XLCI vs. QYLD - Dividend Comparison

XLCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.66%, which matches QYLD's 11.59% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
QYLD
Global X NASDAQ 100 Covered Call ETF
11.59%11.55%12.50%11.78%13.75%12.85%11.16%9.84%12.44%7.69%9.15%9.42%
XLCI
State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF
11.66%5.23%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLCI and QYLD have a correlation of 0.51, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, XLCI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

XLCI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for QYLD.

XLCI has the higher dividend yield at 11.66%, compared with 11.59% for QYLD.

XLCI is categorized as Derivative Income, while QYLD is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Global X. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLCI and 0.60% for QYLD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLCI and QYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer