XLCI vs. IPDP

Last updated Jul 3, 2026

XLCI (State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and IPDP (Dividend Performers ETF) are both Derivative Income funds. Both are actively managed. XLCI charges 0.35%/yr vs 1.52%/yr for IPDP.

Performance

XLCI vs. IPDP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

XLCI

• 1D: -0.06%
• 1M: -2.40%
• 6M: -2.03%
• YTD: -2.03%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

IPDP

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• 6M: —
• YTD: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLCI vs. IPDP - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
XLCI State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	-1.98%
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%

XLCI vs. IPDP - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	XLCI	IPDP
Communication Services	100.0%	-
Financial Services	99.2%	18.6%
Basic Materials	-	3.2%
Consumer Cyclical	-	1.9%
Consumer Defensive	-	3.9%
Energy	-	-
Healthcare	-	13.6%
Industrials	-	45.1%
Real Estate	-	-
Technology	-	13.1%
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

XLCI vs. IPDP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLCI) and Dividend Performers ETF (IPDP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

XLCI vs. IPDP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLCI drawdown since its inception was -8.44%, which is greater than IPDP's maximum drawdown of 0.00%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLCI and IPDP.

Drawdown Indicators

	XLCI	IPDP	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-8.44%	0.00%	-8.44%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-5.01%	0.00%	-5.01%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.84%	0.00%	-1.84%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	XLCI	IPDP	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.48%	0.00%	+11.48%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	11.48%	0.00%	+11.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	11.48%	0.00%	+11.48%

XLCI vs. IPDP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLCI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than IPDP's 1.52% expense ratio.

Dividends

XLCI vs. IPDP - Dividend Comparison

XLCI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 11.66%, while IPDP has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
IPDP Dividend Performers ETF	0.00%	0.00%
XLCI State Street Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF	11.66%	5.23%

Frequently Asked Questions

Which ETF is better, XLCI or IPDP?

On fees, XLCI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, XLCI or IPDP?

XLCI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 1.52% for IPDP.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, XLCI or IPDP?

XLCI has the higher dividend yield at 11.66%, compared with 0.00% for IPDP.

What is the main difference between XLCI and IPDP?

They also come from different issuers: State Street and Innovative Portfolios. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLCI and 1.52% for IPDP.