PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLC vs. XLP
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XLC vs. XLP - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLC achieves a -5.99% return, which is significantly lower than XLP's 9.58% return.


XLC

1D
-0.69%
1M
0.79%
6M
-2.47%
YTD
-5.99%
1Y
3.53%
3Y*
20.18%
5Y*
7.29%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
11.40%

XLP

1D
-0.94%
1M
1.61%
6M
3.35%
YTD
9.58%
1Y
6.81%
3Y*
6.44%
5Y*
6.34%
10Y*
7.07%
ALL TIME*
6.83%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XLC vs. XLP - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
-5.99%23.08%34.71%52.82%-37.63%15.96%26.90%31.05%-16.45%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
9.58%1.52%12.20%-0.82%-0.81%17.20%10.11%27.43%1.61%

Correlation

The correlation between XLC and XLP is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.11

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.33

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018

0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between XLC and XLP has dropped to 0.11 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

XLC vs. XLP - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XLC
XLP

Communication Services

91.2%

-

Technology

8.7%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

1.9%

Consumer Defensive

-

98.1%

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Communication Services

XLC
91.2%
XLP

-

Technology

XLC
8.7%
XLP

-

Basic Materials

XLC

-

XLP

-

Consumer Cyclical

XLC

-

XLP
1.9%

Consumer Defensive

XLC

-

XLP
98.1%

Energy

XLC

-

XLP

-

Financial Services

XLC

-

XLP

-

Healthcare

XLC

-

XLP

-

Industrials

XLC

-

XLP

-

Real Estate

XLC

-

XLP

-

Utilities

XLC

-

XLP

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XLC vs. XLP — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLC
XLC Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
XLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1414
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLC Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
XLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLC Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

XLP
XLP Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
XLP Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2121
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLP Sortino Ratio Rank: 2020
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLP Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
XLP Calmar Ratio Rank: 2222
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLP Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLC vs. XLP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XLCXLPDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.24

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.05

1.09

-0.04

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.31

0.71

-0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.84

1.29

-0.45

XLC vs. XLP - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLC Sharpe Ratio is 0.26, which is lower than the XLP Sharpe Ratio of 0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLC and XLP, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XLC vs. XLP - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLC drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, which is greater than XLP's maximum drawdown of -35.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLC and XLP.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XLCXLPDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-46.65%

-35.90%

-10.75%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.57%

-9.69%

-1.88%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-17.97%

-12.39%

-5.58%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.65%

-16.30%

-30.35%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-24.51%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.84%

-5.43%

-2.41%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.55%

-7.05%

-3.50%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.22%

5.27%

-1.05%

Volatility

XLC vs. XLP - Volatility Comparison

Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLP) have volatilities of 5.32% and 5.55%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XLCXLPDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.32%

5.55%

-0.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

11.11%

11.06%

+0.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

13.95%

13.76%

+0.19%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.79%

13.53%

+7.26%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.13%

14.83%

+7.30%

XLC vs. XLP - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLC has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than XLP's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XLC vs. XLP - Dividend Comparison

XLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.30%, less than XLP's 2.61% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLC
Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.30%1.13%0.99%0.82%1.10%0.74%0.68%0.82%0.64%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLP
State Street Consumer Staples Select Sector SPDR ETF
2.61%2.75%2.77%2.63%2.47%2.28%2.50%2.57%3.04%2.62%2.53%2.52%

Frequently Asked Questions


XLC and XLP have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XLP has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to XLC (5.32%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLC dropped -46.65% vs XLP's -35.90%.

On 5-year performance, XLC leads with 7.29% vs 6.34% for XLP. On fees, XLP is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, XLC has been the lower-risk option at 5.32%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XLC has performed better with a 7.29% return vs 6.34%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XLP is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLC.

XLP has the higher dividend yield at 2.61%, compared with 1.30% for XLC.

XLC is categorized as Communications Equities, while XLP is Consumer Staples Equities. XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index, while XLP tracks Consumer Staples Select Sector Index. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLC and 0.08% for XLP.

XLP currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.50 vs 0.26), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XLC and XLP

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer