XLC vs. SCHX
XLC (Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund) and SCHX (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLC is a Communications Equities fund tracking the S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index, while SCHX is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLC returned 8.03%/yr vs 12.76%/yr for SCHX. Their correlation of 0.81 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XLC charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.03%/yr for SCHX.
Performance
XLC vs. SCHX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLC achieves a -4.85% return, which is significantly lower than SCHX's 8.86% return.
XLC
- 1D
- -0.42%
- 1M
- -4.66%
- YTD
- -4.85%
- 6M
- -3.59%
- 1Y
- 10.19%
- 3Y*
- 21.60%
- 5Y*
- 8.03%
- 10Y*
- —
SCHX
- 1D
- 0.48%
- 1M
- -0.68%
- YTD
- 8.86%
- 6M
- 9.10%
- 1Y
- 25.11%
- 3Y*
- 20.84%
- 5Y*
- 12.76%
- 10Y*
- 15.35%
XLC vs. SCHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | -4.85% | 23.08% | 34.71% | 52.82% | -37.63% | 15.96% | 26.90% | 31.05% | -16.45% |
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 8.86% | 17.46% | 24.88% | 26.84% | -19.41% | 26.81% | 20.81% | 31.22% | -9.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLC and SCHX is 0.63, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.74 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.81 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 19, 2018 | 0.81 |
The correlation between XLC and SCHX shifts across timeframes, from 0.63 (1 year) to 0.81 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XLC vs. SCHX - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLC
SCHX
Communication Services
Technology
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
Utilities
-
Communication Services
XLC
SCHX
Technology
XLC
SCHX
Basic Materials
XLC
-
SCHX
Consumer Cyclical
XLC
-
SCHX
Consumer Defensive
XLC
-
SCHX
Energy
XLC
-
SCHX
Financial Services
XLC
-
SCHX
Healthcare
XLC
-
SCHX
Industrials
XLC
-
SCHX
Real Estate
XLC
-
SCHX
Utilities
XLC
-
SCHX
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLC vs. SCHX — Risk / Return Rank
XLC
SCHX
XLC vs. SCHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLC | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.22 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.51 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.34 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.86 | 2.63 | -1.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.73 | 11.65 | -8.92 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLC vs. SCHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLC drawdown since its inception was -46.65%, which is greater than SCHX's maximum drawdown of -34.33%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLC and SCHX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLC | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -46.65% | -34.33% | -12.32% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.57% | -9.02% | -1.55% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.97% | -19.04% | +1.07% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -46.65% | -25.41% | -21.24% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -34.33% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.72% | -2.37% | -4.35% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.58% | -3.96% | -6.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.33% | 2.04% | +1.29% |
Volatility
XLC vs. SCHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLC) is 3.57%, while Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF (SCHX) has a volatility of 4.47%. This indicates that XLC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SCHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLC | SCHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.57% | 4.47% | -0.90% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 9.65% | 9.71% | -0.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.28% | 12.47% | +0.81% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 17.19% | +3.49% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 22.17% | 18.17% | +4.00% |
XLC vs. SCHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLC has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHX's 0.03% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLC vs. SCHX - Dividend Comparison
XLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.25%, more than SCHX's 1.02% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SCHX Schwab U.S. Large-Cap ETF | 1.02% | 1.09% | 1.22% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.22% | 1.64% | 1.82% | 2.02% | 1.70% | 1.92% | 2.04% |
XLC Communication Services Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.25% | 1.13% | 0.99% | 0.82% | 1.10% | 0.74% | 0.68% | 0.82% | 0.64% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLC and SCHX have a correlation of 0.63, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
SCHX has higher volatility (4.47%) compared to XLC (3.57%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLC dropped -46.65% vs SCHX's -34.33%.
On 5-year performance, SCHX leads with 12.76% vs 8.03% for XLC. On fees, SCHX is cheaper at 0.03% per year. On volatility, XLC has been the lower-risk option at 3.57%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, SCHX has performed better with a 12.76% return vs 8.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
SCHX is cheaper with a 0.03% expense ratio, compared with 0.13% for XLC.
XLC has the higher dividend yield at 1.25%, compared with 1.02% for SCHX.
XLC is categorized as Communications Equities, while SCHX is Large Cap Blend Equities. XLC tracks S&P Communication Services Select Sector Index, while SCHX tracks Dow Jones U.S. Large-Cap Total Stock Market Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLC and 0.03% for SCHX.
SCHX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.91 vs 0.69), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLC and SCHX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer