XLBP.L vs. SPXP.L
XLBP.L (Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF) and SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLBP.L is a Industrials Equities fund tracking the MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XLBP.L returned 10.67%/yr vs 16.32%/yr for SPXP.L. A 0.62 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLBP.L charges 0.14%/yr vs 0.05%/yr for SPXP.L.
Performance
XLBP.L vs. SPXP.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLBP.L achieves a 12.87% return, which is significantly higher than SPXP.L's 10.55% return. Over the past 10 years, XLBP.L has underperformed SPXP.L with an annualized return of 10.67%, while SPXP.L has yielded a comparatively higher 16.32% annualized return.
XLBP.L
- 1D
- -0.19%
- 1M
- 1.77%
- YTD
- 12.87%
- 6M
- 15.98%
- 1Y
- 20.07%
- 3Y*
- 8.27%
- 5Y*
- 6.07%
- 10Y*
- 10.67%
SPXP.L
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 4.48%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 9.96%
- 1Y
- 29.14%
- 3Y*
- 19.21%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
XLBP.L vs. SPXP.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLBP.L Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF | 12.87% | 3.47% | 0.77% | 6.09% | -1.67% | 28.80% | 15.99% | 19.70% | -9.97% | 12.17% |
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 31.26% | 13.90% | 26.76% | 0.26% | 10.77% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLBP.L and SPXP.L is 0.40, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.52 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014 | 0.62 |
Over the past year, the correlation between XLBP.L and SPXP.L has dropped to 0.40 - well below their long-term average of 0.62, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.
XLBP.L vs. SPXP.L - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLBP.L
SPXP.L
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
Basic Materials
XLBP.L
SPXP.L
Consumer Cyclical
XLBP.L
SPXP.L
Industrials
XLBP.L
SPXP.L
Communication Services
XLBP.L
-
SPXP.L
Consumer Defensive
XLBP.L
-
SPXP.L
Energy
XLBP.L
-
SPXP.L
Financial Services
XLBP.L
-
SPXP.L
Healthcare
XLBP.L
-
SPXP.L
Real Estate
XLBP.L
-
SPXP.L
Technology
XLBP.L
-
SPXP.L
Utilities
XLBP.L
-
SPXP.L
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLBP.L vs. SPXP.L — Risk / Return Rank
XLBP.L
SPXP.L
XLBP.L vs. SPXP.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) and Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLBP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.77 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.23 | 1.52 | -0.29 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.86 | 4.11 | -2.25 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 6.29 | 15.13 | -8.84 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLBP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.35 | 2.78 | -1.43 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.37 | 1.06 | -0.69 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.59 | 1.10 | -0.51 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.56 | 1.15 | -0.59 |
Drawdowns
XLBP.L vs. SPXP.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLBP.L drawdown since its inception was -28.58%, which is greater than SPXP.L's maximum drawdown of -25.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLBP.L and SPXP.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLBP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.58% | -25.46% | -3.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.74% | -7.09% | -3.65% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -21.98% | -20.77% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.98% | -20.77% | -1.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -28.58% | -25.46% | -3.12% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.23% | -0.21% | -3.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -5.53% | -3.50% | -2.03% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.18% | 1.93% | +1.25% |
Volatility
XLBP.L vs. SPXP.L - Volatility Comparison
Invesco US Materials Sector UCITS ETF (XLBP.L) has a higher volatility of 5.17% compared to Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) at 2.65%. This indicates that XLBP.L's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPXP.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLBP.L | SPXP.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.17% | 2.65% | +2.52% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.95% | 7.24% | +4.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 14.85% | 10.49% | +4.36% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 16.38% | 14.23% | +2.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.20% | 16.22% | +1.98% |
XLBP.L vs. SPXP.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLBP.L has a 0.14% expense ratio, which is higher than SPXP.L's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XLBP.L vs. SPXP.L - Dividend Comparison
Neither XLBP.L nor SPXP.L has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
XLBP.L and SPXP.L have a correlation of 0.40, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.14% for XLBP.L.
XLBP.L is categorized as Industrials Equities, while SPXP.L is S&P 500. XLBP.L tracks MSCI World/Materials NR USD, while SPXP.L tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.14% for XLBP.L and 0.05% for SPXP.L.
Find the right allocation for XLBP.L and SPXP.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer