SPXP.L vs. SMT.L
SPXP.L (Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF) and SMT.L (Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc) are both exchange-traded funds - SPXP.L is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index, while SMT.L is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Baillie Gifford Funds. SPXP.L is passively managed, while SMT.L is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, SPXP.L returned 16.32%/yr vs 20.07%/yr for SMT.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. SPXP.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.31%/yr for SMT.L.
Performance
SPXP.L vs. SMT.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, SPXP.L achieves a 10.55% return, which is significantly lower than SMT.L's 29.30% return. Over the past 10 years, SPXP.L has underperformed SMT.L with an annualized return of 16.32%, while SMT.L has yielded a comparatively higher 20.07% annualized return.
SPXP.L
- 1D
- -0.21%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 10.55%
- 6M
- 10.60%
- 1Y
- 29.27%
- 3Y*
- 19.50%
- 5Y*
- 15.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.32%
SMT.L
- 1D
- -0.74%
- 1M
- 7.61%
- YTD
- 29.30%
- 6M
- 44.33%
- 1Y
- 56.00%
- 3Y*
- 30.51%
- 5Y*
- 4.99%
- 10Y*
- 20.07%
SPXP.L vs. SMT.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 10.55% | 9.53% | 27.58% | 20.06% | -8.79% | 31.26% | 13.90% | 26.76% | 0.26% | 10.77% |
SMT.L Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc | 29.30% | 24.72% | 18.75% | 12.46% | -45.71% | 10.46% | 110.49% | 24.76% | 4.64% | 41.09% |
Correlation
The correlation between SPXP.L and SMT.L is 0.62, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.64 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 15, 2014 | 0.60 |
The correlation between SPXP.L and SMT.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.64 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
SPXP.L vs. SMT.L — Risk / Return Rank
SPXP.L
SMT.L
SPXP.L vs. SMT.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) and Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| SPXP.L | SMT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.00 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.23 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.52 | 1.50 | +0.02 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.11 | 4.55 | -0.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 15.14 | 15.42 | -0.28 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| SPXP.L | SMT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.78 | 2.78 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.06 | 0.17 | +0.90 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 1.10 | 0.70 | +0.40 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.15 | 0.56 | +0.59 |
Drawdowns
SPXP.L vs. SMT.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum SPXP.L drawdown since its inception was -25.46%, smaller than the maximum SMT.L drawdown of -62.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for SPXP.L and SMT.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| SPXP.L | SMT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -25.46% | -62.61% | +37.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.09% | -12.26% | +5.17% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -20.77% | -28.05% | +7.28% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -20.77% | -60.11% | +39.34% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -25.46% | -60.11% | +34.65% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.21% | -0.74% | +0.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.50% | -16.03% | +12.53% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.93% | 3.62% | -1.69% |
Volatility
SPXP.L vs. SMT.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF (SPXP.L) is 2.64%, while Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc (SMT.L) has a volatility of 4.09%. This indicates that SPXP.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMT.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| SPXP.L | SMT.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 2.64% | 4.09% | -1.45% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 7.24% | 15.92% | -8.68% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 10.56% | 20.05% | -9.49% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 14.23% | 29.68% | -15.45% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 16.22% | 28.76% | -12.54% |
SPXP.L vs. SMT.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
SPXP.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than SMT.L's 0.31% expense ratio.
Dividends
SPXP.L vs. SMT.L - Dividend Comparison
SPXP.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SMT.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.29%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMT.L Scottish Mortgage Investment Trust plc | 0.29% | 0.37% | 0.44% | 0.51% | 0.51% | 0.26% | 0.27% | 0.54% | 0.66% | 0.67% | 0.93% | 1.05% |
SPXP.L Invesco S&P 500 UCITS ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
SPXP.L and SMT.L have a correlation of 0.62, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SPXP.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SPXP.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.31% for SMT.L.
SPXP.L is categorized as S&P 500, while SMT.L is Global Equities. They also come from different issuers: Invesco and Baillie Gifford Funds. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for SPXP.L and 0.31% for SMT.L.
Find the right allocation for SPXP.L and SMT.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer