XLBI vs. WOOD
XLBI (State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and WOOD (iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLBI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while WOOD is a Materials fund tracking the S&P Global Timber & Forestry Index. XLBI is actively managed, while WOOD is passively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLBI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for WOOD.
Performance
XLBI vs. WOOD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLBI achieves a 7.51% return, which is significantly higher than WOOD's -3.03% return.
XLBI
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- -2.14%
- 6M
- 4.80%
- YTD
- 7.51%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
WOOD
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 3.09%
- 6M
- -9.01%
- YTD
- -3.03%
- 1Y
- -3.84%
- 3Y*
- -0.77%
- 5Y*
- -2.39%
- 10Y*
- 5.69%
XLBI vs. WOOD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLBI State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 7.51% | 2.25% |
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF | -3.03% | -1.94% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLBI and WOOD is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.68 |
XLBI vs. WOOD - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLBI
WOOD
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLBI
WOOD
-
Basic Materials
XLBI
-
WOOD
Communication Services
XLBI
-
WOOD
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLBI
-
WOOD
Consumer Defensive
XLBI
-
WOOD
-
Energy
XLBI
-
WOOD
-
Healthcare
XLBI
-
WOOD
-
Industrials
XLBI
-
WOOD
-
Real Estate
XLBI
-
WOOD
Technology
XLBI
-
WOOD
-
Utilities
XLBI
-
WOOD
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLBI vs. WOOD — Risk / Return Rank
XLBI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
WOOD
XLBI vs. WOOD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLBI) and iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF (WOOD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLBI | WOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 0.98 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | -0.18 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | -0.35 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLBI vs. WOOD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLBI drawdown since its inception was -10.62%, smaller than the maximum WOOD drawdown of -63.25%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLBI and WOOD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLBI | WOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.62% | -63.25% | +52.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -21.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -22.79% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -30.71% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -50.20% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.14% | -21.12% | +18.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.11% | -14.82% | +12.71% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 11.12% | — |
Volatility
XLBI vs. WOOD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLBI | WOOD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.87% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.29% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.86% | 18.70% | -4.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 19.72% | -5.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.86% | 21.71% | -7.85% |
XLBI vs. WOOD - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLBI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is lower than WOOD's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLBI vs. WOOD - Dividend Comparison
XLBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.88%, more than WOOD's 2.43% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
WOOD iShares Global Timber & Forestry ETF | 2.43% | 2.51% | 2.09% | 1.64% | 2.26% | 1.24% | 0.98% | 1.85% | 2.82% | 1.19% | 1.65% | 2.04% |
XLBI State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 14.88% | 7.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLBI and WOOD have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, XLBI is cheaper at 0.35% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLBI is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for WOOD.
XLBI has the higher dividend yield at 14.88%, compared with 2.43% for WOOD.
XLBI is categorized as Derivative Income, while WOOD is Materials. They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLBI and 0.46% for WOOD.
Find the right allocation for XLBI and WOOD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer