XLBI vs. FMAT
XLBI (State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF) and FMAT (Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - XLBI is a Derivative Income fund actively managed by State Street, while FMAT is a Materials fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Materials Index. XLBI is actively managed, while FMAT is passively managed. With a 0.95 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XLBI charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.08%/yr for FMAT.
Performance
XLBI vs. FMAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLBI achieves a 7.03% return, which is significantly lower than FMAT's 8.42% return.
XLBI
- 1D
- -0.44%
- 1M
- -1.63%
- 6M
- 4.62%
- YTD
- 7.03%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FMAT
- 1D
- -0.99%
- 1M
- -4.47%
- 6M
- -0.10%
- YTD
- 8.42%
- 1Y
- 13.65%
- 3Y*
- 8.13%
- 5Y*
- 6.64%
- 10Y*
- 9.48%
XLBI vs. FMAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLBI State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 7.03% | 2.25% |
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF | 8.42% | 4.14% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLBI and FMAT is 0.95 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 30, 2025 | 0.95 |
XLBI vs. FMAT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLBI
FMAT
Financial Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Communication Services
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Healthcare
-
Industrials
-
Real Estate
-
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Financial Services
XLBI
FMAT
-
Basic Materials
XLBI
-
FMAT
Communication Services
XLBI
-
FMAT
-
Consumer Cyclical
XLBI
-
FMAT
Consumer Defensive
XLBI
-
FMAT
Energy
XLBI
-
FMAT
Healthcare
XLBI
-
FMAT
Industrials
XLBI
-
FMAT
Real Estate
XLBI
-
FMAT
-
Technology
XLBI
-
FMAT
Utilities
XLBI
-
FMAT
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLBI vs. FMAT — Risk / Return Rank
XLBI
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
FMAT
XLBI vs. FMAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF (XLBI) and Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF (FMAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLBI | FMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.14 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 1.02 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 3.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLBI vs. FMAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLBI drawdown since its inception was -10.62%, smaller than the maximum FMAT drawdown of -41.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLBI and FMAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLBI | FMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -10.62% | -41.11% | +30.49% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -13.48% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.17% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -25.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -41.11% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.58% | -7.90% | +5.32% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.11% | -6.86% | +4.75% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 4.53% | — |
Volatility
XLBI vs. FMAT - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLBI | FMAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 4.95% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.79% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 13.84% | 18.53% | -4.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 19.70% | -5.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.84% | 21.18% | -7.34% |
XLBI vs. FMAT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLBI has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than FMAT's 0.08% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLBI vs. FMAT - Dividend Comparison
XLBI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 14.94%, more than FMAT's 1.46% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FMAT Fidelity MSCI Materials Index ETF | 1.46% | 1.64% | 1.68% | 1.71% | 2.00% | 1.44% | 1.73% | 1.89% | 2.18% | 1.53% | 1.78% | 2.16% |
XLBI State Street Materials Select Sector SPDR Premium Income ETF | 14.94% | 7.71% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.95, XLBI and FMAT move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, FMAT is cheaper at 0.08% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
FMAT is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for XLBI.
XLBI has the higher dividend yield at 14.94%, compared with 1.46% for FMAT.
XLBI is categorized as Derivative Income, while FMAT is Materials. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Fidelity. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for XLBI and 0.08% for FMAT.
Find the right allocation for XLBI and FMAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer