PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XLB vs. VRTIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

XLB vs. VRTIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

XLB vs. VRTIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
10.68%9.94%0.15%12.46%-12.30%27.44%20.46%24.13%-14.88%24.01%
VRTIX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund Institutional Shares
-2.47%12.55%11.59%17.01%-20.40%14.71%20.46%25.60%-10.92%14.77%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XLB achieves a 10.68% return, which is significantly higher than VRTIX's -2.47% return. Over the past 10 years, XLB has outperformed VRTIX with an annualized return of 10.45%, while VRTIX has yielded a comparatively lower 9.54% annualized return.


XLB

1D
1.79%
1M
-6.02%
YTD
10.68%
6M
12.59%
1Y
18.51%
3Y*
9.53%
5Y*
6.79%
10Y*
10.45%

VRTIX

1D
-1.45%
1M
-8.17%
YTD
-2.47%
6M
-0.32%
1Y
21.61%
3Y*
11.72%
5Y*
3.03%
10Y*
9.54%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


XLB vs. VRTIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XLB has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is higher than VRTIX's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Return for Risk

XLB vs. VRTIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XLB
XLB Risk / Return Rank: 5454
Overall Rank
XLB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5353
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XLB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
XLB Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
XLB Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
XLB Martin Ratio Rank: 5252
Martin Ratio Rank

VRTIX
VRTIX Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
VRTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5151
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 5757
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XLB vs. VRTIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XLBVRTIXDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.89

0.91

-0.02

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.38

1.40

-0.03

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.18

1.18

0.00

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.35

1.33

+0.02

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

4.72

5.03

-0.31

XLB vs. VRTIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XLB Sharpe Ratio is 0.89, which is comparable to the VRTIX Sharpe Ratio of 0.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XLB and VRTIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XLBVRTIXDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.89

0.91

-0.02

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.36

0.14

+0.23

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.51

0.41

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.36

0.46

-0.10

Correlation

The correlation between XLB and VRTIX is 0.76, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

XLB vs. VRTIX - Dividend Comparison

XLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.75%, more than VRTIX's 1.30% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
XLB
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF
1.75%1.92%1.92%2.00%2.26%1.62%1.72%1.98%2.20%1.66%1.95%2.24%
VRTIX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.30%1.00%1.23%1.46%1.50%1.05%1.14%1.36%1.49%1.24%1.33%1.31%

Drawdowns

XLB vs. VRTIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XLB drawdown since its inception was -59.83%, which is greater than VRTIX's maximum drawdown of -41.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLB and VRTIX.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


XLBVRTIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-59.83%

-41.69%

-18.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.64%

-13.91%

-0.73%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-24.72%

-31.98%

+7.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-37.27%

-41.69%

+4.42%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.39%

-10.99%

+4.60%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-10.88%

-8.48%

-2.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

4.20%

3.68%

+0.52%

Volatility

XLB vs. VRTIX - Volatility Comparison

Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTIX) have volatilities of 6.28% and 6.61%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


XLBVRTIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.28%

6.61%

-0.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.53%

14.12%

-1.59%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.95%

23.12%

-2.17%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

18.91%

22.58%

-3.67%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

20.62%

23.39%

-2.77%