PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRTIX vs. VB
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRTIX vs. VB - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTIX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, VRTIX achieves a 17.65% return, which is significantly higher than VB's 14.91% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with VRTIX having a 11.14% annualized return and VB not far ahead at 11.38%.


VRTIX

1D
-0.45%
1M
3.42%
YTD
17.65%
6M
18.62%
1Y
42.26%
3Y*
18.21%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
11.14%

VB

1D
0.75%
1M
3.68%
YTD
14.91%
6M
16.03%
1Y
31.39%
3Y*
17.31%
5Y*
7.35%
10Y*
11.38%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRTIX vs. VB - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRTIX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund Institutional Shares
17.65%12.55%11.59%17.01%-20.40%14.71%20.46%25.60%-10.92%14.77%
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
14.91%8.87%14.17%18.22%-17.51%17.57%19.19%27.34%-9.34%16.26%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTIX and VB is 0.96 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.96

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.97

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.98

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.98

The correlation between VRTIX and VB has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.96 to 0.98 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRTIX vs. VB — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTIX
VRTIX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VRTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VB
VB Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
VB Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5656
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VB Sortino Ratio Rank: 5757
Sortino Ratio Rank
VB Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
VB Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
VB Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTIX vs. VB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTIX) and Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRTIXVBDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

1.94

+0.30

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.08

2.75

+0.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.34

+0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

3.48

+0.34

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.59

12.82

+0.76

VRTIX vs. VB - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRTIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the VB Sharpe Ratio of 1.94. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTIX and VB, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRTIXVBDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

1.94

+0.30

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.36

-0.08

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.53

-0.06

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.44

+0.07

Drawdowns

VRTIX vs. VB - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTIX drawdown since its inception was -41.69%, smaller than the maximum VB drawdown of -59.56%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTIX and VB.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTIXVBDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.69%

-59.56%

+17.87%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-8.98%

-2.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.72%

-25.36%

-2.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.98%

-28.15%

-3.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.69%

-42.05%

+0.36%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

0.00%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-8.44%

+0.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.43%

+0.66%

Volatility

VRTIX vs. VB - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTIX) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to Vanguard Small-Cap ETF (VB) at 4.40%. This indicates that VRTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VB based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTIXVBDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

4.40%

+1.15%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.57%

11.73%

+1.84%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.16%

16.27%

+2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.60%

20.75%

+1.85%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.46%

21.43%

+2.03%

VRTIX vs. VB - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTIX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is higher than VB's 0.05% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VRTIX vs. VB - Dividend Comparison

VRTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than VB's 1.19% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VB
Vanguard Small-Cap ETF
1.19%1.33%1.30%1.55%1.59%1.24%1.14%1.39%1.67%1.35%1.50%1.48%
VRTIX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.08%1.00%1.23%1.46%1.50%1.05%1.14%1.36%1.49%1.24%1.33%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


With a correlation of 0.96, VRTIX and VB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

VRTIX has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to VB (4.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTIX dropped -41.69% vs VB's -59.56%.

VRTIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.24 vs 1.94), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRTIX and VB

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer