PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
VRTIX vs. VIOV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

VRTIX vs. VIOV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTIX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with VRTIX having a 17.65% return and VIOV slightly lower at 16.78%. Over the past 10 years, VRTIX has outperformed VIOV with an annualized return of 11.14%, while VIOV has yielded a comparatively lower 10.37% annualized return.


VRTIX

1D
-0.45%
1M
3.42%
YTD
17.65%
6M
18.62%
1Y
42.26%
3Y*
18.21%
5Y*
6.22%
10Y*
11.14%

VIOV

1D
1.15%
1M
2.34%
YTD
16.78%
6M
17.90%
1Y
41.64%
3Y*
14.79%
5Y*
6.04%
10Y*
10.37%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

VRTIX vs. VIOV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
VRTIX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund Institutional Shares
17.65%12.55%11.59%17.01%-20.40%14.71%20.46%25.60%-10.92%14.77%
VIOV
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
16.78%6.63%7.44%15.36%-11.37%30.67%2.81%24.44%-12.85%11.54%

Correlation

The correlation between VRTIX and VIOV is 0.88, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.88

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.92

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.93

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.93

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2010

0.90

The correlation between VRTIX and VIOV has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.88 to 0.93 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

VRTIX vs. VIOV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

VRTIX
VRTIX Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
VRTIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VRTIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
VRTIX Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
VRTIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VRTIX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank

VIOV
VIOV Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
VIOV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6868
Sharpe Ratio Rank
VIOV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7070
Sortino Ratio Rank
VIOV Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
VIOV Calmar Ratio Rank: 8282
Calmar Ratio Rank
VIOV Martin Ratio Rank: 7474
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

VRTIX vs. VIOV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTIX) and Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


VRTIXVIOVDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

2.24

2.28

-0.04

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

3.08

3.23

-0.15

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.37

1.39

-0.02

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.82

4.36

-0.54

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

13.59

14.24

-0.66

VRTIX vs. VIOV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current VRTIX Sharpe Ratio is 2.24, which is comparable to the VIOV Sharpe Ratio of 2.28. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of VRTIX and VIOV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


VRTIXVIOVDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

2.24

2.28

-0.04

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.28

0.28

0.00

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.48

0.44

+0.04

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.51

0.54

-0.02

Drawdowns

VRTIX vs. VIOV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum VRTIX drawdown since its inception was -41.69%, smaller than the maximum VIOV drawdown of -47.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for VRTIX and VIOV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


VRTIXVIOVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-41.69%

-47.36%

+5.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.99%

-9.33%

-1.66%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.72%

-28.44%

+0.72%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.98%

-28.44%

-3.54%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-41.69%

-47.36%

+5.67%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.02%

0.00%

-1.02%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.40%

-7.38%

-1.02%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.09%

2.86%

+0.23%

Volatility

VRTIX vs. VIOV - Volatility Comparison

Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund Institutional Shares (VRTIX) has a higher volatility of 5.55% compared to Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF (VIOV) at 4.51%. This indicates that VRTIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VIOV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


VRTIXVIOVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.55%

4.51%

+1.04%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

13.57%

11.49%

+2.08%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.16%

18.38%

+0.78%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

22.60%

21.95%

+0.65%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

23.46%

23.89%

-0.43%

VRTIX vs. VIOV - Expense Ratio Comparison

VRTIX has a 0.08% expense ratio, which is lower than VIOV's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

VRTIX vs. VIOV - Dividend Comparison

VRTIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.08%, less than VIOV's 1.57% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
VIOV
Vanguard S&P Small-Cap 600 Value ETF
1.57%1.69%1.78%2.18%1.81%1.59%1.42%1.60%1.76%1.43%1.17%1.32%
VRTIX
Vanguard Russell 2000 Index Fund Institutional Shares
1.08%1.00%1.23%1.46%1.50%1.05%1.14%1.36%1.49%1.24%1.33%1.31%

Frequently Asked Questions


VRTIX and VIOV have a correlation of 0.88, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

VRTIX has higher volatility (5.55%) compared to VIOV (4.51%). In terms of maximum drawdown, VRTIX dropped -41.69% vs VIOV's -47.36%.

VIOV currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.28 vs 2.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for VRTIX and VIOV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer