XLB vs. HOMZ
XLB (Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF) and HOMZ (Hoya Capital Housing ETF) are both Materials funds - XLB tracks the Materials Select Sector Index while HOMZ tracks the Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XLB returned 5.35%/yr vs 3.51%/yr for HOMZ. A 0.75 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. XLB charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.30%/yr for HOMZ.
Performance
XLB vs. HOMZ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLB achieves a 14.35% return, which is significantly higher than HOMZ's -3.23% return.
XLB
- 1D
- 0.21%
- 1M
- 1.93%
- YTD
- 14.35%
- 6M
- 17.15%
- 1Y
- 19.99%
- 3Y*
- 11.71%
- 5Y*
- 5.35%
- 10Y*
- 10.23%
HOMZ
- 1D
- -0.61%
- 1M
- -0.25%
- YTD
- -3.23%
- 6M
- -6.20%
- 1Y
- 4.91%
- 3Y*
- 9.05%
- 5Y*
- 3.51%
- 10Y*
- —
XLB vs. HOMZ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 14.35% | 9.94% | 0.15% | 12.46% | -12.30% | 27.44% | 20.46% | 12.69% |
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF | -3.23% | 2.72% | 9.49% | 36.49% | -28.14% | 41.02% | 15.80% | 17.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLB and HOMZ is 0.71, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.75 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.77 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 21, 2019 | 0.75 |
The correlation between XLB and HOMZ has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.71 to 0.77 - a consistent structural relationship.
XLB vs. HOMZ - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XLB
HOMZ
Basic Materials
Consumer Cyclical
Industrials
Communication Services
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
Healthcare
-
-
Real Estate
-
Technology
-
Utilities
-
-
Basic Materials
XLB
HOMZ
Consumer Cyclical
XLB
HOMZ
Industrials
XLB
HOMZ
Communication Services
XLB
-
HOMZ
Consumer Defensive
XLB
-
HOMZ
Energy
XLB
-
HOMZ
-
Financial Services
XLB
-
HOMZ
Healthcare
XLB
-
HOMZ
-
Real Estate
XLB
-
HOMZ
Technology
XLB
-
HOMZ
Utilities
XLB
-
HOMZ
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLB vs. HOMZ — Risk / Return Rank
XLB
HOMZ
XLB vs. HOMZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| XLB | HOMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.95 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +1.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.21 | 1.06 | +0.15 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.62 | 0.29 | +1.33 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.06 | 0.67 | +4.39 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| XLB | HOMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.20 | 0.25 | +0.95 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.28 | 0.16 | +0.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.50 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.36 | 0.42 | -0.06 |
Drawdowns
XLB vs. HOMZ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLB drawdown since its inception was -59.83%, which is greater than HOMZ's maximum drawdown of -48.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLB and HOMZ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLB | HOMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.83% | -48.10% | -11.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | -16.71% | +4.33% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.17% | -22.91% | -0.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.72% | -33.76% | +9.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -3.28% | -12.58% | +9.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.84% | -9.74% | -1.10% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.96% | 7.35% | -3.39% |
Volatility
XLB vs. HOMZ - Volatility Comparison
Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) has a higher volatility of 5.73% compared to Hoya Capital Housing ETF (HOMZ) at 5.34%. This indicates that XLB's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HOMZ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLB | HOMZ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.73% | 5.34% | +0.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.85% | 13.56% | -0.71% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 16.78% | 19.55% | -2.77% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 18.94% | 21.47% | -2.53% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.65% | 24.99% | -4.34% |
XLB vs. HOMZ - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLB has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than HOMZ's 0.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLB vs. HOMZ - Dividend Comparison
XLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.69%, less than HOMZ's 2.74% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HOMZ Hoya Capital Housing ETF | 2.74% | 2.54% | 2.13% | 2.08% | 2.03% | 1.21% | 3.18% | 1.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.69% | 1.92% | 1.92% | 2.00% | 2.26% | 1.62% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.20% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 2.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XLB and HOMZ have a correlation of 0.71, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XLB has higher volatility (5.73%) compared to HOMZ (5.34%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XLB dropped -59.83% vs HOMZ's -48.10%.
On 5-year performance, XLB leads with 5.35% vs 3.51% for HOMZ. On fees, XLB is cheaper at 0.13% per year. On volatility, HOMZ has been the lower-risk option at 5.34%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XLB has performed better with a 5.35% return vs 3.51%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XLB is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.30% for HOMZ.
HOMZ has the higher dividend yield at 2.74%, compared with 1.69% for XLB.
XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index, while HOMZ tracks Hoya Capital Housing 100 Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and Pettee Investors. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLB and 0.30% for HOMZ.
XLB currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.20 vs 0.25), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XLB and HOMZ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer