XLB vs. DVXB
XLB (Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF) and DVXB (WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF) are both Materials funds - XLB tracks the Materials Select Sector Index while DVXB tracks the Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index. Both are passively managed. With a 0.99 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XLB charges 0.13%/yr vs 0.89%/yr for DVXB.
Performance
XLB vs. DVXB - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XLB achieves a 15.25% return, which is significantly lower than DVXB's 19.96% return.
XLB
- 1D
- 1.33%
- 1M
- 2.05%
- YTD
- 15.25%
- 6M
- 14.02%
- 1Y
- 21.60%
- 3Y*
- 10.91%
- 5Y*
- 6.87%
- 10Y*
- 11.03%
DVXB
- 1D
- 1.81%
- 1M
- 1.67%
- YTD
- 19.96%
- 6M
- 17.31%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
XLB vs. DVXB - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 15.25% | -0.36% |
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 19.96% | -6.27% |
Correlation
The correlation between XLB and DVXB is 0.99 - these two move nearly in lockstep. At this level, holding both provides almost no diversification benefit. If you already own one, adding the other does little to reduce portfolio risk.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 23, 2025 | 0.99 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XLB vs. DVXB — Risk / Return Rank
XLB
DVXB
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
XLB vs. DVXB - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF (XLB) and WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF (DVXB). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XLB | DVXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.22 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.75 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 5.32 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XLB vs. DVXB - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XLB drawdown since its inception was -59.83%, which is greater than DVXB's maximum drawdown of -19.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XLB and DVXB.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XLB | DVXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -59.83% | -19.77% | -40.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -12.38% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -23.17% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -24.72% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -37.27% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.53% | -9.11% | +6.58% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -10.82% | -7.12% | -3.70% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.07% | — | — |
Volatility
XLB vs. DVXB - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XLB | DVXB | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.14% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.66% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.52% | 30.73% | -13.21% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.03% | 30.73% | -11.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.66% | 30.73% | -10.07% |
XLB vs. DVXB - Expense Ratio Comparison
XLB has a 0.13% expense ratio, which is lower than DVXB's 0.89% expense ratio.
Dividends
XLB vs. DVXB - Dividend Comparison
XLB's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.64%, while DVXB has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DVXB WEBs Materials XLB Defined Volatility ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLB Materials Select Sector SPDR ETF | 1.64% | 1.92% | 1.92% | 2.00% | 2.26% | 1.62% | 1.72% | 1.98% | 2.20% | 1.66% | 1.95% | 2.24% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.99, XLB and DVXB move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, XLB is cheaper at 0.13% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
XLB is cheaper with a 0.13% expense ratio, compared with 0.89% for DVXB.
XLB has the higher dividend yield at 1.64%, compared with 0.00% for DVXB.
XLB tracks Materials Select Sector Index, while DVXB tracks Syntax Defined Volatility XLB Index. They also come from different issuers: State Street and WEBs. Their fees differ too: 0.13% for XLB and 0.89% for DVXB.
Find the right allocation for XLB and DVXB
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer