PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XJR vs. SMMV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XJR vs. SMMV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJR achieves a 21.53% return, which is significantly higher than SMMV's 9.33% return.


XJR

1D
-0.12%
1M
-0.71%
6M
15.81%
YTD
21.53%
1Y
33.14%
3Y*
13.33%
5Y*
7.17%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
15.09%

SMMV

1D
-0.06%
1M
0.56%
6M
7.36%
YTD
9.33%
1Y
16.10%
3Y*
12.24%
5Y*
6.29%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
8.71%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$337.38K$347.17K$431.55K
$397.40K$346.04K$432.61K

XJR vs. SMMV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
21.53%4.73%9.59%16.39%-17.30%24.96%35.61%
SMMV
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF
9.33%6.42%18.29%5.63%-10.00%16.64%19.52%

Correlation

The correlation between XJR and SMMV is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.72

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.83

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.87

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020

0.87

The correlation between XJR and SMMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

XJR vs. SMMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XJR
SMMV

Financial Services

17.7%
9.2%

Technology

16.2%
13.7%

Industrials

15.8%
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

13.9%
5.3%

Healthcare

12.6%
18.7%

Real Estate

7.7%
12.5%

Basic Materials

4.5%
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

3.6%
7.6%

Communication Services

3.3%
5.1%

Energy

3.1%
5.2%

Utilities

1.5%
7.5%

Financial Services

XJR
17.7%
SMMV
9.2%

Technology

XJR
16.2%
SMMV
13.7%

Industrials

XJR
15.8%
SMMV
13.6%

Consumer Cyclical

XJR
13.9%
SMMV
5.3%

Healthcare

XJR
12.6%
SMMV
18.7%

Real Estate

XJR
7.7%
SMMV
12.5%

Basic Materials

XJR
4.5%
SMMV
1.6%

Consumer Defensive

XJR
3.6%
SMMV
7.6%

Communication Services

XJR
3.3%
SMMV
5.1%

Energy

XJR
3.1%
SMMV
5.2%

Utilities

XJR
1.5%
SMMV
7.5%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XJR vs. SMMV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

XJR
XJR Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
XJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJR Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
XJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJR Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

SMMV
SMMV Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
SMMV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMMV Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMMV Omega Ratio Rank: 6868
Omega Ratio Rank
SMMV Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMMV Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

XJR vs. SMMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XJRSMMVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.22

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.28

+0.03

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.33

2.19

+1.13

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.84

6.75

+4.09

XJR vs. SMMV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJR Sharpe Ratio is 1.77, which is comparable to the SMMV Sharpe Ratio of 1.58. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJR and SMMV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XJR vs. SMMV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum SMMV drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and SMMV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XJRSMMVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.14%

-38.77%

+11.63%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-7.02%

-2.41%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.14%

-13.68%

-13.46%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.14%

-18.00%

-9.14%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.18%

-1.07%

-1.11%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.25%

-5.04%

-4.21%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.89%

2.28%

+0.61%

Volatility

XJR vs. SMMV - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) at 2.85%. This indicates that XJR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XJRSMMVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.74%

2.85%

+0.89%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.25%

6.98%

+5.27%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.74%

9.75%

+7.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.30%

13.44%

+7.86%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.57%

15.62%

+5.95%

XJR vs. SMMV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SMMV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XJR vs. SMMV - Dividend Comparison

XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than SMMV's 1.66% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
SMMV
iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF
1.66%1.77%1.76%2.30%1.67%1.08%1.39%1.64%1.72%1.63%0.79%
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
0.94%1.14%1.96%0.92%1.29%2.00%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XJR and SMMV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XJR has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to SMMV (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJR dropped -27.14% vs SMMV's -38.77%.

On 5-year performance, XJR leads with 7.17% vs 6.29% for SMMV. On fees, XJR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, XJR has performed better with a 7.17% return vs 6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XJR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SMMV.

SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.94% for XJR.

XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while SMMV tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJR and 0.20% for SMMV.

XJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XJR and SMMV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer