XJR vs. SMMV
XJR (iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF) and SMMV (iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF) are both Small Cap Blend Equities funds from iShares - XJR tracks the S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index while SMMV tracks the MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XJR returned 7.17%/yr vs 6.29%/yr for SMMV. Their correlation of 0.87 means they have usually moved in the same direction. XJR charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for SMMV.
Performance
XJR vs. SMMV - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XJR achieves a 21.53% return, which is significantly higher than SMMV's 9.33% return.
XJR
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- -0.71%
- 6M
- 15.81%
- YTD
- 21.53%
- 1Y
- 33.14%
- 3Y*
- 13.33%
- 5Y*
- 7.17%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 15.09%
SMMV
- 1D
- -0.06%
- 1M
- 0.56%
- 6M
- 7.36%
- YTD
- 9.33%
- 1Y
- 16.10%
- 3Y*
- 12.24%
- 5Y*
- 6.29%
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 8.71%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $337.38K | $347.17K | $431.55K | |
| $397.40K | $346.04K | $432.61K |
XJR vs. SMMV - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 21.53% | 4.73% | 9.59% | 16.39% | -17.30% | 24.96% | 35.61% |
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 9.33% | 6.42% | 18.29% | 5.63% | -10.00% | 16.64% | 19.52% |
Correlation
The correlation between XJR and SMMV is 0.72, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.87 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020 | 0.87 |
The correlation between XJR and SMMV shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.87 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XJR vs. SMMV - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XJR
SMMV
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Cyclical
Healthcare
Real Estate
Basic Materials
Consumer Defensive
Communication Services
Energy
Utilities
Financial Services
XJR
SMMV
Technology
XJR
SMMV
Industrials
XJR
SMMV
Consumer Cyclical
XJR
SMMV
Healthcare
XJR
SMMV
Real Estate
XJR
SMMV
Basic Materials
XJR
SMMV
Consumer Defensive
XJR
SMMV
Communication Services
XJR
SMMV
Energy
XJR
SMMV
Utilities
XJR
SMMV
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XJR vs. SMMV — Risk / Return Rank
XJR
SMMV
XJR vs. SMMV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XJR | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.19 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.31 | 1.28 | +0.03 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.33 | 2.19 | +1.13 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 10.84 | 6.75 | +4.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XJR vs. SMMV - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum SMMV drawdown of -38.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and SMMV.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XJR | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -27.14% | -38.77% | +11.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.43% | -7.02% | -2.41% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -27.14% | -13.68% | -13.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -27.14% | -18.00% | -9.14% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -1.07% | -1.11% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.25% | -5.04% | -4.21% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 2.28% | +0.61% |
Volatility
XJR vs. SMMV - Volatility Comparison
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) has a higher volatility of 3.74% compared to iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF (SMMV) at 2.85%. This indicates that XJR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SMMV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XJR | SMMV | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.74% | 2.85% | +0.89% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.25% | 6.98% | +5.27% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 17.74% | 9.75% | +7.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.30% | 13.44% | +7.86% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.57% | 15.62% | +5.95% |
XJR vs. SMMV - Expense Ratio Comparison
XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SMMV's 0.20% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
XJR vs. SMMV - Dividend Comparison
XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.94%, less than SMMV's 1.66% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMMV iShares MSCI USA Small-Cap Min Vol Factor ETF | 1.66% | 1.77% | 1.76% | 2.30% | 1.67% | 1.08% | 1.39% | 1.64% | 1.72% | 1.63% | 0.79% |
XJR iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF | 0.94% | 1.14% | 1.96% | 0.92% | 1.29% | 2.00% | 0.58% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XJR and SMMV have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XJR has higher volatility (3.74%) compared to SMMV (2.85%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJR dropped -27.14% vs SMMV's -38.77%.
On 5-year performance, XJR leads with 7.17% vs 6.29% for SMMV. On fees, XJR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, SMMV has been the lower-risk option at 2.85%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, XJR has performed better with a 7.17% return vs 6.29%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XJR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.20% for SMMV.
SMMV has the higher dividend yield at 1.66%, compared with 0.94% for XJR.
XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while SMMV tracks MSCI USA Small Cap Minimum Volatility (USD) Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJR and 0.20% for SMMV.
XJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.77 vs 1.58), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XJR and SMMV
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer