PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XJR vs. SLV
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XJR vs. SLV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJR achieves a 19.44% return, which is significantly higher than SLV's -13.49% return.


XJR

1D
-0.38%
1M
4.96%
YTD
19.44%
6M
17.14%
1Y
32.21%
3Y*
16.10%
5Y*
6.15%
10Y*

SLV

1D
-5.40%
1M
-18.48%
YTD
-13.49%
6M
-14.05%
1Y
69.08%
3Y*
39.38%
5Y*
18.31%
10Y*
12.68%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJR vs. SLV - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
19.44%4.73%9.59%16.39%-17.30%24.96%35.61%
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
-13.49%144.66%20.89%-1.09%2.37%-12.45%16.06%

Correlation

The correlation between XJR and SLV is 0.19, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.19

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020

0.21

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XJR vs. SLV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJR
XJR Risk / Return Rank: 6161
Overall Rank
XJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJR Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
XJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJR Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank

SLV
SLV Risk / Return Rank: 3131
Overall Rank
SLV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SLV Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
SLV Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
SLV Calmar Ratio Rank: 3030
Calmar Ratio Rank
SLV Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJR vs. SLV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and iShares Silver Trust (SLV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


XJRSLVDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.65

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.09

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.31

1.25

+0.06

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

3.43

1.47

+1.96

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.11

3.16

+7.95

XJR vs. SLV - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJR Sharpe Ratio is 1.80, which is higher than the SLV Sharpe Ratio of 1.15. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJR and SLV, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XJR vs. SLV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum SLV drawdown of -76.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and SLV.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XJRSLVDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.14%

-76.28%

+49.14%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-47.23%

+37.80%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.14%

-47.23%

+20.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.14%

-47.23%

+20.09%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.23%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.38%

-47.23%

+46.85%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.39%

-44.65%

+35.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.91%

21.91%

-19.00%

Volatility

XJR vs. SLV - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) is 5.13%, while iShares Silver Trust (SLV) has a volatility of 14.34%. This indicates that XJR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SLV based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XJRSLVDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.13%

14.34%

-9.21%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.61%

59.27%

-46.66%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

18.03%

60.33%

-42.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.44%

36.59%

-15.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.70%

32.09%

-10.39%

XJR vs. SLV - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than SLV's 0.50% expense ratio.


Dividends

XJR vs. SLV - Dividend Comparison

XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.96%, while SLV has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
SLV
iShares Silver Trust
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
0.96%1.14%1.96%0.92%1.29%2.00%0.58%

Frequently Asked Questions


XJR and SLV have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

SLV has higher volatility (14.34%) compared to XJR (5.13%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJR dropped -27.14% vs SLV's -76.28%.

On 5-year performance, SLV leads with 18.31% vs 6.15% for XJR. On fees, XJR is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, XJR has been the lower-risk option at 5.13%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, SLV has performed better with a 18.31% return vs 6.15%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XJR is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for SLV.

XJR has the higher dividend yield at 0.96%, compared with 0.00% for SLV.

XJR is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while SLV is Silver. XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while SLV tracks LBMA Silver Price. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJR and 0.50% for SLV.

XJR currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 1.15), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XJR and SLV

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer