PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
XJR vs. DGRO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

XJR vs. DGRO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, XJR achieves a 14.91% return, which is significantly higher than DGRO's 8.76% return.


XJR

1D
-0.96%
1M
2.16%
YTD
14.91%
6M
13.91%
1Y
28.36%
3Y*
14.13%
5Y*
5.38%
10Y*

DGRO

1D
-0.28%
1M
3.14%
YTD
8.76%
6M
8.75%
1Y
22.54%
3Y*
16.99%
5Y*
10.54%
10Y*
13.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJR vs. DGRO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
14.91%4.73%9.59%16.39%-17.30%24.96%35.61%
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
8.76%15.69%16.62%10.47%-7.91%26.64%16.65%

Correlation

The correlation between XJR and DGRO is 0.79, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.79

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.79

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 25, 2020

0.80

The correlation between XJR and DGRO has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.79 to 0.81 - a consistent structural relationship.

XJR vs. DGRO - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
XJR
DGRO

Financial Services

18.2%
21.2%

Technology

16.8%
19.4%

Industrials

15.5%
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

13.5%
5.7%

Healthcare

10.7%
16.4%

Real Estate

7.6%

-

Energy

4.7%
5.6%

Basic Materials

4.5%
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

2.7%
11.5%

Communication Services

2.5%
0.1%

Utilities

2.0%
6.9%

Financial Services

XJR
18.2%
DGRO
21.2%

Technology

XJR
16.8%
DGRO
19.4%

Industrials

XJR
15.5%
DGRO
10.8%

Consumer Cyclical

XJR
13.5%
DGRO
5.7%

Healthcare

XJR
10.7%
DGRO
16.4%

Real Estate

XJR
7.6%
DGRO

-

Energy

XJR
4.7%
DGRO
5.6%

Basic Materials

XJR
4.5%
DGRO
2.5%

Consumer Defensive

XJR
2.7%
DGRO
11.5%

Communication Services

XJR
2.5%
DGRO
0.1%

Utilities

XJR
2.0%
DGRO
6.9%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

XJR vs. DGRO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

XJR
XJR Risk / Return Rank: 5151
Overall Rank
XJR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJR Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJR Omega Ratio Rank: 4343
Omega Ratio Rank
XJR Calmar Ratio Rank: 6060
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJR Martin Ratio Rank: 5656
Martin Ratio Rank

DGRO
DGRO Risk / Return Rank: 7171
Overall Rank
DGRO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7171
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DGRO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7676
Sortino Ratio Rank
DGRO Omega Ratio Rank: 7070
Omega Ratio Rank
DGRO Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
DGRO Martin Ratio Rank: 7171
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJR vs. DGRO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) and iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


XJRDGRODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.60

2.39

-0.79

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.36

3.49

-1.13

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.28

1.43

-0.15

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

3.02

3.50

-0.48

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

9.70

13.52

-3.82

XJR vs. DGRO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJR Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is lower than the DGRO Sharpe Ratio of 2.39. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJR and DGRO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


XJRDGRODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.60

2.39

-0.79

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

0.77

-0.51

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.80

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.67

0.76

-0.10

Drawdowns

XJR vs. DGRO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJR drawdown since its inception was -27.14%, smaller than the maximum DGRO drawdown of -35.10%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJR and DGRO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


XJRDGRODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-27.14%

-35.10%

+7.96%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.43%

-6.47%

-2.96%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-27.14%

-14.03%

-13.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-27.14%

-19.31%

-7.83%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-35.10%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.96%

-0.28%

-0.68%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.48%

-3.44%

-6.04%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.93%

1.67%

+1.26%

Volatility

XJR vs. DGRO - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF (XJR) has a higher volatility of 4.77% compared to iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF (DGRO) at 2.21%. This indicates that XJR's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGRO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


XJRDGRODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.77%

2.21%

+2.56%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.22%

6.91%

+5.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

17.85%

9.48%

+8.37%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.43%

13.82%

+7.61%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.73%

16.62%

+5.11%

XJR vs. DGRO - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJR has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is higher than DGRO's 0.08% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

XJR vs. DGRO - Dividend Comparison

XJR's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.99%, less than DGRO's 1.96% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
DGRO
iShares Core Dividend Growth ETF
1.96%2.09%2.26%2.45%2.34%1.93%2.30%2.21%2.44%2.03%2.27%2.52%
XJR
iShares ESG Screened S&P Small-Cap ETF
0.99%1.14%1.96%0.92%1.29%2.00%0.58%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


XJR and DGRO have a correlation of 0.79, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

XJR has higher volatility (4.77%) compared to DGRO (2.21%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJR dropped -27.14% vs DGRO's -35.10%.

On 5-year performance, DGRO leads with 10.54% vs 5.38% for XJR. On fees, DGRO is cheaper at 0.08% per year. On volatility, DGRO has been the lower-risk option at 2.21%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, DGRO has performed better with a 10.54% return vs 5.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

DGRO is cheaper with a 0.08% expense ratio, compared with 0.12% for XJR.

DGRO has the higher dividend yield at 1.96%, compared with 0.99% for XJR.

XJR is categorized as Small Cap Blend Equities, while DGRO is Large Cap Growth Equities. XJR tracks S&P SmallCap 600 Sustainability Screened Index, while DGRO tracks Morningstar US Dividend Growth Index. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJR and 0.08% for DGRO.

DGRO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.39 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XJR and DGRO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer