PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
XJH vs. FNX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

XJH vs. FNX

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

XJH (iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF) and FNX (First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund) are both Mid Cap Blend Equities funds - XJH tracks the S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index while FNX tracks the NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, XJH returned 8.08%/yr vs 8.91%/yr for FNX. With a 0.97 correlation, they move nearly in lockstep. XJH charges 0.12%/yr vs 0.60%/yr for FNX.

Performance

XJH vs. FNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with XJH having a 16.36% return and FNX slightly lower at 15.76%.

XJH

1D
1.10%
1M
3.08%
YTD
16.36%
6M
14.06%
1Y
28.30%
3Y*
16.05%
5Y*
8.08%
10Y*
—

FNX

1D
0.99%
1M
3.25%
YTD
15.76%
6M
13.36%
1Y
29.74%
3Y*
17.67%
5Y*
8.91%
10Y*
13.03%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

XJH vs. FNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
XJH
iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF		16.36%8.12%12.27%16.74%-14.36%23.43%29.59%
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund		15.76%9.87%12.21%20.39%-13.57%25.05%30.75%

Correlation

The correlation between XJH and FNX is 0.95, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.95

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.96

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.97

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 24, 2020

0.97

The correlation between XJH and FNX has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.95 to 0.97 - a consistent structural relationship.

XJH vs. FNX - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors
XJH
FNX

Industrials

26.8%
18.2%

Technology

16.7%
13.3%

Financial Services

14.0%
18.7%

Healthcare

9.7%
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

9.6%
15.4%

Real Estate

8.1%
7.1%

Basic Materials

5.0%
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

4.2%
3.2%

Energy

2.9%
5.7%

Utilities

1.5%
2.8%

Communication Services

1.1%
2.4%

Industrials

XJH
26.8%
FNX
18.2%

Technology

XJH
16.7%
FNX
13.3%

Financial Services

XJH
14.0%
FNX
18.7%

Healthcare

XJH
9.7%
FNX
10.1%

Consumer Cyclical

XJH
9.6%
FNX
15.4%

Real Estate

XJH
8.1%
FNX
7.1%

Basic Materials

XJH
5.0%
FNX
3.2%

Consumer Defensive

XJH
4.2%
FNX
3.2%

Energy

XJH
2.9%
FNX
5.7%

Utilities

XJH
1.5%
FNX
2.8%

Communication Services

XJH
1.1%
FNX
2.4%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF

First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund

Often compared with XJH:
XJH vs. XJRXJH vs. XMMOXJH vs. NUMVXJH vs. IJHXJH vs. NUMGXJH vs. MDYXJH vs. FZIPX
Often compared with FNX:
FNX vs. FNCMXFNX vs. MDYFNX vs. FLQMFNX vs. AVMVFNX vs. SPYFNX vs. VOFNX vs. VOE

Return for Risk

XJH vs. FNX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
XJH
XJH Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
XJH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5959
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XJH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
XJH Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
XJH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
XJH Martin Ratio Rank: 6868
Martin Ratio Rank
FNX
FNX Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
FNX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FNX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6666
Sortino Ratio Rank
FNX Omega Ratio Rank: 5858
Omega Ratio Rank
FNX Calmar Ratio Rank: 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
FNX Martin Ratio Rank: 7070
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

XJH vs. FNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) and First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

XJHFNXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.72
1.83

-0.11

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
2.49
2.65

-0.17

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.31

-0.02

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.96

3.23

-0.27

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

10.89

11.12

-0.23

XJH vs. FNX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current XJH Sharpe Ratio is 1.72, which is comparable to the FNX Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of XJH and FNX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Drawdowns

XJH vs. FNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum XJH drawdown since its inception was -25.07%, smaller than the maximum FNX drawdown of -57.11%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XJH and FNX.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

XJHFNXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-25.07%

-57.11%

+32.04%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-9.61%

-9.24%

-0.37%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-24.56%

-24.97%

+0.41%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.07%

-24.97%

-0.10%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

—

-43.95%

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-6.76%

-8.38%

+1.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.60%

2.68%

-0.08%

Volatility

XJH vs. FNX - Volatility Comparison

iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF (XJH) has a higher volatility of 4.70% compared to First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund (FNX) at 4.45%. This indicates that XJH's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FNX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

XJHFNXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

4.70%

4.45%

+0.25%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.34%

11.71%

+0.63%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

16.61%

16.38%

+0.23%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.96%

20.51%

-0.55%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.86%

21.95%

-2.09%

XJH vs. FNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

XJH has a 0.12% expense ratio, which is lower than FNX's 0.60% expense ratio.

Dividends

XJH vs. FNX - Dividend Comparison

XJH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.07%, more than FNX's 0.99% yield.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
FNX
First Trust Mid Cap Core AlphaDEX Fund		0.99%0.88%1.26%1.11%1.19%0.94%1.04%1.21%1.01%0.90%1.07%1.07%
XJH
iShares ESG Screened S&P Mid-Cap ETF		1.07%1.24%1.24%1.38%1.45%1.04%0.36%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

With a correlation of 0.95, XJH and FNX move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

XJH has higher volatility (4.70%) compared to FNX (4.45%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XJH dropped -25.07% vs FNX's -57.11%.

On 5-year performance, FNX leads with 8.91% vs 8.08% for XJH. On fees, XJH is cheaper at 0.12% per year. On volatility, FNX has been the lower-risk option at 4.45%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, FNX has performed better with a 8.91% return vs 8.08%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

XJH is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for FNX.

XJH has the higher dividend yield at 1.07%, compared with 0.99% for FNX.

XJH tracks S&P MidCap 400 Sustainability Screened Index, while FNX tracks NASDAQ AlphaDEX Mid Cap Core Index. They also come from different issuers: iShares and First Trust. Their fees differ too: 0.12% for XJH and 0.60% for FNX.

FNX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.72), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for XJH and FNX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer