XITK vs. XT
XITK (SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF) and XT (iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF) are both Technology Equities funds - XITK tracks the FactSet Innovative Technology Index while XT tracks the Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, XITK returned 13.96%/yr vs 15.25%/yr for XT. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. XITK charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.46%/yr for XT.
Performance
XITK vs. XT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, XITK achieves a 1.90% return, which is significantly lower than XT's 16.34% return. Over the past 10 years, XITK has underperformed XT with an annualized return of 13.96%, while XT has yielded a comparatively higher 15.25% annualized return.
XITK
- 1D
- -1.25%
- 1M
- -8.08%
- YTD
- 1.90%
- 6M
- 0.34%
- 1Y
- -0.80%
- 3Y*
- 13.32%
- 5Y*
- -4.43%
- 10Y*
- 13.96%
XT
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- 16.34%
- 6M
- 14.74%
- 1Y
- 35.47%
- 3Y*
- 17.99%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- 15.25%
XITK vs. XT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 1.90% | 2.53% | 19.12% | 45.87% | -47.45% | -11.24% | 90.22% | 36.98% | 7.60% | 36.01% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 16.34% | 26.28% | 0.29% | 27.02% | -27.83% | 16.43% | 35.10% | 30.74% | -4.93% | 33.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between XITK and XT is 0.72, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.72 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.83 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.86 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.82 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 14, 2016 | 0.80 |
The correlation between XITK and XT shifts across timeframes, from 0.72 (1 year) to 0.86 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
XITK vs. XT - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
XITK
XT
Technology
Communication Services
Healthcare
Industrials
Financial Services
Consumer Cyclical
Real Estate
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Defensive
-
Energy
-
Utilities
-
Technology
XITK
XT
Communication Services
XITK
XT
Healthcare
XITK
XT
Industrials
XITK
XT
Financial Services
XITK
XT
Consumer Cyclical
XITK
XT
Real Estate
XITK
XT
Basic Materials
XITK
-
XT
Consumer Defensive
XITK
-
XT
Energy
XITK
-
XT
Utilities
XITK
-
XT
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
XITK vs. XT — Risk / Return Rank
XITK
XT
XITK vs. XT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) and iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| XITK | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.10 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.60 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.02 | 1.36 | -0.34 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | 3.41 | -3.44 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.07 | 13.44 | -13.50 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
XITK vs. XT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum XITK drawdown since its inception was -65.56%, which is greater than XT's maximum drawdown of -34.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for XITK and XT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| XITK | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -65.56% | -34.41% | -31.15% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -28.03% | -10.45% | -17.58% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.18% | -22.09% | -6.09% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.53% | -34.41% | -27.12% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -65.56% | -34.41% | -31.15% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.52% | -3.67% | -26.85% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -22.10% | -7.38% | -14.72% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 12.17% | 2.65% | +9.52% |
Volatility
XITK vs. XT - Volatility Comparison
SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF (XITK) has a higher volatility of 12.20% compared to iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF (XT) at 7.81%. This indicates that XITK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| XITK | XT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.20% | 7.81% | +4.39% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 23.82% | 13.77% | +10.05% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 27.92% | 17.21% | +10.71% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 32.88% | 21.00% | +11.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.71% | 20.11% | +9.60% |
XITK vs. XT - Expense Ratio Comparison
XITK has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than XT's 0.46% expense ratio.
Dividends
XITK vs. XT - Dividend Comparison
XITK has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.04%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
XITK SPDR FactSet Innovative Technology ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.11% | 0.00% | 0.06% | 0.14% | 1.50% | 1.74% | 1.88% | 0.00% |
XT iShares Future Exponential Technologies ETF | 7.04% | 7.95% | 0.66% | 0.41% | 0.78% | 0.84% | 0.77% | 1.55% | 1.40% | 0.97% | 1.37% | 1.34% |
Frequently Asked Questions
XITK and XT have a correlation of 0.72, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
XITK has higher volatility (12.20%) compared to XT (7.81%). In terms of maximum drawdown, XITK dropped -65.56% vs XT's -34.41%.
On 10-year performance, XT leads with 15.25% vs 13.96% for XITK. On fees, XITK is cheaper at 0.45% per year. On volatility, XT has been the lower-risk option at 7.81%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, XT has performed better with a 15.25% return vs 13.96%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
XITK is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.46% for XT.
XT has the higher dividend yield at 7.04%, compared with 0.00% for XITK.
XITK tracks FactSet Innovative Technology Index, while XT tracks Morningstar Exponential Technologies Index (Net). They also come from different issuers: State Street and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for XITK and 0.46% for XT.
XT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.07 vs -0.03), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for XITK and XT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer