PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
BLNK vs. CHPT
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BLNK and CHPT is 0.61, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


-0.50.00.51.0
Correlation: 0.6

Performance

BLNK vs. CHPT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) and ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-100.00%-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-76.99%
-93.87%
BLNK
CHPT

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BLNK:

-0.96

CHPT:

-0.74

Sortino Ratio

BLNK:

-1.81

CHPT:

-1.04

Omega Ratio

BLNK:

0.81

CHPT:

0.89

Calmar Ratio

BLNK:

-0.74

CHPT:

-0.64

Martin Ratio

BLNK:

-1.45

CHPT:

-1.38

Ulcer Index

BLNK:

50.16%

CHPT:

45.62%

Daily Std Dev

BLNK:

75.99%

CHPT:

84.74%

Max Drawdown

BLNK:

-98.89%

CHPT:

-98.83%

Current Drawdown

BLNK:

-98.89%

CHPT:

-98.70%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BLNK:

$69.01M

CHPT:

$273.96M

EPS

BLNK:

-$1.96

CHPT:

-$0.64

PS Ratio

BLNK:

0.55

CHPT:

0.66

PB Ratio

BLNK:

0.62

CHPT:

2.00

Total Revenue (TTM)

BLNK:

$117.83M

CHPT:

$417.08M

Gross Profit (TTM)

BLNK:

$18.09M

CHPT:

$100.68M

EBITDA (TTM)

BLNK:

-$126.29M

CHPT:

-$218.85M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLNK achieves a -51.67% return, which is significantly lower than CHPT's -44.12% return.


BLNK

YTD

-51.67%

1M

-29.60%

6M

-66.58%

1Y

-70.66%

5Y*

-17.19%

10Y*

N/A

CHPT

YTD

-44.12%

1M

-13.35%

6M

-54.70%

1Y

-62.16%

5Y*

-42.83%

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

BLNK vs. CHPT — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLNK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLNK is 99
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLNK is 77
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLNK is 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLNK is 99
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLNK is 1010
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLNK is 1515
Martin Ratio Rank

CHPT
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CHPT is 1616
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CHPT is 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CHPT is 1515
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CHPT is 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CHPT is 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CHPT is 1818
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BLNK vs. CHPT - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) and ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for BLNK, currently valued at -0.96, compared to the broader market-2.00-1.000.001.002.003.00
BLNK: -0.96
CHPT: -0.74
The chart of Sortino ratio for BLNK, currently valued at -1.81, compared to the broader market-6.00-4.00-2.000.002.004.00
BLNK: -1.81
CHPT: -1.04
The chart of Omega ratio for BLNK, currently valued at 0.81, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.00
BLNK: 0.81
CHPT: 0.89
The chart of Calmar ratio for BLNK, currently valued at -0.74, compared to the broader market0.001.002.003.004.00
BLNK: -0.74
CHPT: -0.64
The chart of Martin ratio for BLNK, currently valued at -1.45, compared to the broader market-5.000.005.0010.0015.0020.00
BLNK: -1.45
CHPT: -1.38

The current BLNK Sharpe Ratio is -0.96, which is comparable to the CHPT Sharpe Ratio of -0.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLNK and CHPT, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-1.00-0.80-0.60-0.40-0.200.00NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-0.96
-0.74
BLNK
CHPT

Dividends

BLNK vs. CHPT - Dividend Comparison

Neither BLNK nor CHPT has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BLNK vs. CHPT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLNK drawdown since its inception was -98.89%, roughly equal to the maximum CHPT drawdown of -98.83%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLNK and CHPT. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-99.00%-98.50%-98.00%-97.50%-97.00%-96.50%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
-98.89%
-98.70%
BLNK
CHPT

Volatility

BLNK vs. CHPT - Volatility Comparison

Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) and ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) have volatilities of 20.36% and 20.74%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


15.00%20.00%25.00%30.00%35.00%NovemberDecember2025FebruaryMarchApril
20.36%
20.74%
BLNK
CHPT

Financials

BLNK vs. CHPT - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blink Charging Co. and ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab