BLNK vs. CHPT
BLNK (Blink Charging Co.) and CHPT (ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. Both operate in the Specialty Retail industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 5 years, BLNK returned -54.36%/yr vs -57.70%/yr for CHPT. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BLNK vs. CHPT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both stocks are quite close, with BLNK having a 15.05% return and CHPT slightly lower at 14.61%.
BLNK
- 1D
- -3.36%
- 1M
- 5.95%
- YTD
- 15.05%
- 6M
- -43.16%
- 1Y
- -2.42%
- 3Y*
- -51.46%
- 5Y*
- -54.36%
- 10Y*
- —
CHPT
- 1D
- -6.85%
- 1M
- 22.54%
- YTD
- 14.61%
- 6M
- -8.86%
- 1Y
- -50.70%
- 3Y*
- -65.25%
- 5Y*
- -57.70%
- 10Y*
- —
BLNK vs. CHPT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLNK Blink Charging Co. | 15.05% | -52.01% | -59.00% | -69.10% | -58.62% | -37.99% | 2,198.39% | -36.30% |
CHPT ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. | 14.61% | -68.97% | -54.27% | -75.45% | -49.97% | -52.47% | 308.98% | 0.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLNK and CHPT is 0.59, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.62 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2019 | 0.60 |
The correlation between BLNK and CHPT has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.59 to 0.67 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
BLNK:
$109.86M
CHPT:
$182.40M
BLNK:
-$0.63
CHPT:
-$9.40
BLNK:
0.87
CHPT:
0.43
BLNK:
2.03
CHPT:
8.56
BLNK:
$103.40M
CHPT:
$411.22M
BLNK:
$24.62M
CHPT:
$125.60M
BLNK:
-$58.57M
CHPT:
-$182.42M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLNK vs. CHPT — Risk / Return Rank
BLNK
CHPT
BLNK vs. CHPT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) and ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| BLNK | CHPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.02 | -0.71 | +0.68 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.75 | -0.86 | +1.61 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 0.90 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.03 | -0.69 | +0.66 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.05 | -0.99 | +0.94 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BLNK | CHPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.02 | -0.71 | +0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.66 | -0.73 | +0.07 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.21 | -0.50 | +0.29 |
Drawdowns
BLNK vs. CHPT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLNK drawdown since its inception was -99.17%, roughly equal to the maximum CHPT drawdown of -99.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLNK and CHPT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLNK | CHPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.17% | -99.51% | +0.34% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.94% | -74.18% | -5.76% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.69% | -97.69% | +5.00% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.93% | -99.37% | +0.44% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.74% | -99.17% | +0.43% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.02% | -64.85% | -8.17% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.00% | 51.26% | +0.74% |
Volatility
BLNK vs. CHPT - Volatility Comparison
Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) has a higher volatility of 30.62% compared to ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. (CHPT) at 18.55%. This indicates that BLNK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CHPT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLNK | CHPT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 30.62% | 18.55% | +12.07% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 68.14% | 47.99% | +20.15% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 98.42% | 73.02% | +25.40% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.07% | 79.37% | +3.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 121.50% | 76.74% | +44.76% |
Dividends
BLNK vs. CHPT - Dividend Comparison
Neither BLNK nor CHPT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BLNK vs. CHPT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blink Charging Co. and ChargePoint Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
BLNK vs. CHPT - Profitability Comparison
BLNK - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blink Charging Co. reported a gross profit of 6.64M and revenue of 20.78M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 32.0%.
CHPT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. reported a gross profit of 34.40M and revenue of 109.32M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 31.5%.
BLNK - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blink Charging Co. reported an operating income of -11.78M and revenue of 20.78M, resulting in an operating margin of -56.7%.
CHPT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. reported an operating income of -52.99M and revenue of 109.32M, resulting in an operating margin of -48.5%.
BLNK - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Blink Charging Co. reported a net income of -11.56M and revenue of 20.78M, resulting in a net margin of -55.7%.
CHPT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, ChargePoint Holdings, Inc. reported a net income of -44.42M and revenue of 109.32M, resulting in a net margin of -40.6%.
Frequently Asked Questions
BLNK and CHPT have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
BLNK has higher volatility (30.62%) compared to CHPT (18.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLNK dropped -99.17% vs CHPT's -99.51%.
BLNK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.02 vs -0.71), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLNK and CHPT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer