PortfoliosLab logo
BLNK vs. QS
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between BLNK and QS is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.


Performance

BLNK vs. QS - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) and QuantumScape Corporation (QS). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

BLNK:

-1.02

QS:

-0.38

Sortino Ratio

BLNK:

-2.07

QS:

-0.24

Omega Ratio

BLNK:

0.78

QS:

0.97

Calmar Ratio

BLNK:

-0.78

QS:

-0.31

Martin Ratio

BLNK:

-1.36

QS:

-0.73

Ulcer Index

BLNK:

56.54%

QS:

41.47%

Daily Std Dev

BLNK:

75.44%

QS:

73.79%

Max Drawdown

BLNK:

-98.91%

QS:

-97.36%

Current Drawdown

BLNK:

-98.81%

QS:

-96.98%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

BLNK:

$74.05M

QS:

$2.22B

EPS

BLNK:

-$1.99

QS:

-$0.91

PS Ratio

BLNK:

0.68

QS:

0.00

PB Ratio

BLNK:

0.71

QS:

2.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

BLNK:

$108.40M

QS:

$0.00

Gross Profit (TTM)

BLNK:

$16.20M

QS:

-$64.13M

EBITDA (TTM)

BLNK:

-$133.16M

QS:

-$403.39M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, BLNK achieves a -48.14% return, which is significantly lower than QS's -23.51% return.


BLNK

YTD

-48.14%

1M

-6.36%

6M

-52.88%

1Y

-77.40%

3Y*

-63.11%

5Y*

-15.47%

10Y*

N/A

QS

YTD

-23.51%

1M

0.25%

6M

-23.06%

1Y

-31.55%

3Y*

-28.41%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Blink Charging Co.

QuantumScape Corporation

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

BLNK vs. QS — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BLNK
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of BLNK is 66
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of BLNK is 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of BLNK is 22
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of BLNK is 55
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of BLNK is 66
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of BLNK is 1212
Martin Ratio Rank

QS
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of QS is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of QS is 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of QS is 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of QS is 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of QS is 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of QS is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

BLNK vs. QS - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) and QuantumScape Corporation (QS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current BLNK Sharpe Ratio is -1.02, which is lower than the QS Sharpe Ratio of -0.38. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of BLNK and QS, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

BLNK vs. QS - Dividend Comparison

Neither BLNK nor QS has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

BLNK vs. QS - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BLNK drawdown since its inception was -98.91%, roughly equal to the maximum QS drawdown of -97.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLNK and QS.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

BLNK vs. QS - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) is 20.14%, while QuantumScape Corporation (QS) has a volatility of 22.46%. This indicates that BLNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

BLNK vs. QS - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blink Charging Co. and QuantumScape Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0020.00M40.00M60.00M80.00M20212022202320242025
20.75M
0
(BLNK) Total Revenue
(QS) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items