BLNK vs. QS
BLNK (Blink Charging Co.) and QS (QuantumScape Corporation) are both stocks. Both are in the Consumer Cyclical sector — BLNK in Specialty Retail, QS in Auto Parts. Over the past 5 years, BLNK returned -56.85%/yr vs -23.58%/yr for QS. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
BLNK vs. QS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BLNK achieves a -6.91% return, which is significantly higher than QS's -28.79% return.
BLNK
- 1D
- -4.86%
- 1M
- -24.30%
- YTD
- -6.91%
- 6M
- -14.16%
- 1Y
- -25.53%
- 3Y*
- -52.13%
- 5Y*
- -56.85%
- 10Y*
- —
QS
- 1D
- -2.50%
- 1M
- -9.51%
- YTD
- -28.79%
- 6M
- -35.08%
- 1Y
- 75.00%
- 3Y*
- 2.75%
- 5Y*
- -23.58%
- 10Y*
- —
BLNK vs. QS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BLNK Blink Charging Co. | -6.91% | -52.01% | -59.00% | -69.10% | -58.62% | -37.99% | 286.70% |
QS QuantumScape Corporation | -28.79% | 100.77% | -25.32% | 22.57% | -74.45% | -73.72% | 757.36% |
Correlation
The correlation between BLNK and QS is 0.58, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.57 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.63 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 17, 2020 | 0.60 |
The correlation between BLNK and QS has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.57 to 0.63 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
BLNK:
$88.89M
QS:
$4.53B
BLNK:
-$0.63
QS:
-$0.72
BLNK:
1.65
QS:
4.09
BLNK:
$103.40M
QS:
$0.00
BLNK:
$24.62M
QS:
-$49.03M
BLNK:
-$58.57M
QS:
-$378.92M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BLNK vs. QS — Risk / Return Rank
BLNK
QS
BLNK vs. QS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) and QuantumScape Corporation (QS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| BLNK | QS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.99 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.58 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.03 | 1.21 | -0.19 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.32 | 1.11 | -1.43 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 1.69 | -2.16 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
BLNK vs. QS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BLNK drawdown since its inception was -99.17%, roughly equal to the maximum QS drawdown of -97.36%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BLNK and QS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BLNK | QS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.17% | -97.36% | -1.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -79.94% | -67.68% | -12.26% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -92.69% | -73.93% | -18.76% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -98.93% | -91.45% | -7.48% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -98.98% | -94.36% | -4.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.54% | -85.56% | +12.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 54.56% | 44.61% | +9.95% |
Volatility
BLNK vs. QS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Blink Charging Co. (BLNK) is 15.65%, while QuantumScape Corporation (QS) has a volatility of 27.70%. This indicates that BLNK experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BLNK | QS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 15.65% | 27.70% | -12.05% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 63.31% | 50.48% | +12.83% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 96.26% | 104.40% | -8.14% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 83.13% | 86.14% | -3.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 121.17% | 105.92% | +15.25% |
Dividends
BLNK vs. QS - Dividend Comparison
Neither BLNK nor QS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
BLNK vs. QS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Blink Charging Co. and QuantumScape Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
BLNK and QS have a correlation of 0.58, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
QS has higher volatility (27.70%) compared to BLNK (15.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, BLNK dropped -99.17% vs QS's -97.36%.
QS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.72 vs -0.27), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for BLNK and QS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer